From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shiganta@in.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
nasastry@in.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: powerpc: Fix online CPU selection
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:42:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dadaa6d4-c720-f426-55af-ab93ed86644d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200608144212.985144-1-sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
On 08/06/20 8:12 pm, Sandipan Das wrote:
> The size of the cpu set must be large enough for systems
> with a very large number of CPUs. Otherwise, tests which
> try to determine the first online CPU by calling
> sched_getaffinity() will fail. This makes sure that the
> size of the allocated cpu set is dependent on the number
> of CPUs as reported by get_nprocs().
>
> Fixes: 3752e453f6ba ("selftests/powerpc: Add tests of PMU EBBs")
> Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta <shiganta@in.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
> index 933678f1ed0a..bb8e402752c0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> @@ -88,28 +89,36 @@ void *get_auxv_entry(int type)
> [...]
> int pick_online_cpu(void)
> {
> - cpu_set_t mask;
> - int cpu;
> + int ncpus, cpu = -1;
> + cpu_set_t *mask;
> + size_t size;
>
> - CPU_ZERO(&mask);
> + ncpus = get_nprocs();
> + size = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(ncpus);
> + mask = CPU_ALLOC(ncpus);
>
> - if (sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask)) {
> + CPU_ZERO_S(size, mask);
> +
> + if (sched_getaffinity(0, size, mask)) {
> perror("sched_getaffinity");
> - return -1;
> + goto done;
> }
>
> /* We prefer a primary thread, but skip 0 */
> - for (cpu = 8; cpu < CPU_SETSIZE; cpu += 8)
> - if (CPU_ISSET(cpu, &mask))
> - return cpu;
> + for (cpu = 8; cpu < ncpus; cpu += 8)
> + if (CPU_ISSET_S(cpu, size, mask))
> + goto done;
>
> /* Search for anything, but in reverse */
> - for (cpu = CPU_SETSIZE - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--)
> - if (CPU_ISSET(cpu, &mask))
> - return cpu;
> + for (cpu = ncpus - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--)
> + if (CPU_ISSET_S(cpu, size, mask))
> + goto done;
>
> printf("No cpus in affinity mask?!\n");
> - return -1;
There's a bug here as cpu should have been set to -1.
Will send v2 with this fix.
> +
> +done:
> + CPU_FREE(mask);
> + return cpu;
> }
>
> bool is_ppc64le(void)
>
- Sandipan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-09 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 14:42 [PATCH] selftests: powerpc: Fix online CPU selection Sandipan Das
2020-06-08 15:05 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2020-06-09 6:12 ` Sandipan Das [this message]
2020-06-09 6:20 ` Sandipan Das
2020-06-08 16:52 Harish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dadaa6d4-c720-f426-55af-ab93ed86644d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nasastry@in.ibm.com \
--cc=shiganta@in.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).