From: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:50:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc38afe9-6b78-f3f5-666b-986939e40fc6@keymile.com> (raw)
Hi all,
we are currently trying to update from kernel 3.10 to latest stable kernel 4.4
and we encounter the following problem.
When I try to debug our multithreaded userspace application with gdb I get
stuck when trying to single step code.
Due to the fact that our ppc 8360 target is mainlined (kmeter1) I was able to
bisect the kernel to check when this problem was introduced. It turns out to be
introduced with commit:
commit 0c8c0f03e3a292e031596484275c14cf39c0ab7a
Author: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Date: Fri Jul 17 12:28:11 2015 +0200
x86/fpu, sched: Dynamically allocate 'struct fpu'
This patch moves the definition of "struct thread_struct thread;" from the
middle of the "struct task_struct" to the end (include/linux/sched.h). When I
move back the definition to the original place and recompile, everything works
fine. I double-checked this with the latest kernel 4.7 and I have the same
behaviour.
I also tried a different toolchain (I got poky/jethro with gcc 5.2) and tried a
eldk 5.4 with gcc 4.7, as I am not sure if this is really a kernel problem or
related to a gdb or gcc. But I still have the same behaviour with a different
toolchain.
Does anyone have an idea why the change in sched.h break my debug usecase?
Anyone out here who is debugging ppc83xx targets flawlessly with a recent kernel?
Any help is apreciated.
Best regards
Holger Brunck
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-12 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 14:50 Holger Brunck [this message]
2016-08-12 15:14 ` debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct Dave Hansen
2016-08-12 15:47 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-12 16:09 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-15 14:35 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-15 16:19 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-16 17:27 ` christophe leroy
2016-08-16 17:36 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-17 8:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-17 15:27 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-18 8:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:14 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-19 13:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 16:26 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-16 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-17 15:05 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-17 14:59 ` Holger Brunck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc38afe9-6b78-f3f5-666b-986939e40fc6@keymile.com \
--to=holger.brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).