From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363CFC5DF63 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21002075C for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com header.i=@arista.com header.b="MpZHturj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B21002075C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=arista.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477cpm2npWzF5l5 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:00:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arista.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::543; helo=mail-pg1-x543.google.com; envelope-from=dima@arista.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=arista.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=arista.com header.i=@arista.com header.b="MpZHturj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477Wl902FWzF4Pk for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 03:12:20 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id h27so508560pgn.0 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:12:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6YKC1kJOcWpyD+8pjGdr6zJNIwDWfqyBu/N6KBSP97U=; b=MpZHturjPCBg33iU1ozhAjvA8LCtPPFI3DR58OYlFEaUZGZqfEzhUtttDDrlEOGegQ 4vDex9qExlxkA9WH33d8HwoxTLWivc69W/6aer4DXfteqgbtXwv3cNxCcRds4ZAMweGX 5ZXj+X+FYkL8t+hZqh4LwhZRZNRrqod+Up3sqXtFrQSRV7C3Y69W33Z8X4jj1Fl7gbuY R6u824u7CLy//WZ/duinZirY1ifbAiK575WJqRiWdVx2qkiQPu6t7SWS7JDhyX5hOHLe oe8RLdwEfd46kke7TKQhcEtTSIZl2oUQhbinVc7bj3yYIQzIfU4ltgAEvZlXwG6aLosM UhRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6YKC1kJOcWpyD+8pjGdr6zJNIwDWfqyBu/N6KBSP97U=; b=aQThQnilMc1Yhj3AII4+G8Vr4uKdOLjvk94yDo3KDCBZMN1u881otVM32l2z+9ORli 1TvBnsFAMEoh9ii4IaNVxSVvtjHmGJfMpEIocLQmunt9TA75UtcAh88IOffoQAtVvgAu u+vppgsxuFuNf/qswPETAMdEGH5/pMjfFs6rsNWiEMVOJ+5CdJp8GChCGHB/ubgnQWSv 0xQOf7gAJOmOiCQVcH8G8+GEIeS0P37s+MU0DoPD2L0/dVmvduRuvCNGWDhYCg5UQoFp qYtux+TqbX+pCvdmL3C3RAP2O111YLXqkCmfZ2Rtz0N1wuRdZ7iKCZb1CvNA3gEv4VKE lf7g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVJrl1wWSAtLdsg5NyqiuNgmTmsL+1hOMpdf2TUm6RZEs84msAz NIRq2dtIF6WraplwTHFT7wGR2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwR0pSNn59pPusYKfkpnLRmR/vqqpv4L3qv+M0Onv9D6hRgWRQkxTVXtCrUTdykmM2sB1/Rnw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:908b:: with SMTP id i11mr4396653pfa.140.1573056738752; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:12:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.83.36.153] ([217.173.96.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4sm5535967pjf.25.2019.11.06.08.12.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:12:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() To: Petr Mladek References: <20191106030542.868541-1-dima@arista.com> <20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz> From: Dmitry Safonov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 16:12:01 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 06:55:51 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juri Lelli , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Ben Segall , Guo Ren , Pavel Machek , Vincent Guittot , Paul Burton , Geert Uytterhoeven , Mel Gorman , Jiri Slaby , Matt Turner , uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, Len Brown , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Dietmar Eggemann , Richard Henderson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , James Hogan , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Vincent Chen , Ingo Molnar , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Vasily Gorbik , Aurelien Jacquiot , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Stafford Horne , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Tony Luck , Douglas Anderson , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Will Deacon , Daniel Thompson , Brian Cain , Christian Borntraeger , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Fenghua Yu , Borislav Petkov , Jeff Dike , Steven Rostedt , Ivan Kokshaysky , Greentime Hu , Guan Xuetao , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Ley Foon Tan , "David S. Miller" , Rich Felker , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Anton Ivanov , Jonas Bonn , Richard Weinberger , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Ingo Molnar , Mark Salter , Albert Ou , Stefan Kristiansson , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Paul Walmsley , Michal Simek , Vineet Gupta , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , Palmer Dabbelt , Jason Wessel , nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11/6/19 8:35 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2019-11-06 03:04:51, Dmitry Safonov wrote: >> Add log level argument to show_stack(). >> Done in three stages: >> 1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture >> 2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level >> 3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack() >> >> Justification: >> o It's a design mistake to move a business-logic decision >> into platform realization detail. >> o I have currently two patches sets that would benefit from this work: >> Removing console_loglevel jumps in sysrq driver [1] > > Just to clarify. The problem in sysrq driver is a bit different. > It modifies console_loglevel to show even less important message > on the console. > > IMHO, it should be solved by printing the header line with pr_error(). > It is not ideal. A cleaner solution might be to introduce another > loglevel that will always get pushed to the console. But I am > not sure if it is worth this single line. I believe why it's not done - there is a comment in sysrq code that said the userspace relies on the loglevel of sysrq messages (and may trigger alerts from emerg/err log level): * Raise the apparent loglevel to maximum so that the sysrq header * is shown to provide the user with positive feedback. We do not * simply emit this at KERN_EMERG as that would change message * routing in the consumers of /proc/kmsg. But I don't mind any solution. >> Hung task warning before panic [2] - suggested by Tetsuo (but he >> probably didn't realise what it would involve). >> o While doing (1), (2) the backtraces were adjusted to headers >> and other messages for each situation - so there won't be a situation >> when the backtrace is printed, but the headers are missing because >> they have lesser log level (or the reverse). >> o As the result in (2) plays with console_loglevel for kdb are removed. > >> The least important for upstream, but maybe still worth to note that >> every company I've worked in so far had an off-list patch to print >> backtrace with the needed log level (but only for the architecture they >> cared about). >> If you have other ideas how you will benefit from show_stack() with >> a log level - please, reply to this cover letter. > > I agree with all the other justification. > > I would add. The backtrace is really useful for debugging. It should > be possible to print it even in less critical situations. > > I am afraid that many people use WARN() for this purpose. But WARN() > is not always appropriate. WARN() misuse huts when panic_on_warn > option is used. Thanks, Petr. -- Dmitry