From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] mm: Section numbers use the type "unsigned long"
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e07449fa-251f-51c7-9ee2-202635c4aef7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190614120036.00ae392e3f210e7bc9ec6960@linux-foundation.org>
On 14.06.19 21:00, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:01:09 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> We are using a mixture of "int" and "unsigned long". Let's make this
>> consistent by using "unsigned long" everywhere. We'll do the same with
>> memory block ids next.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> - int i, ret, section_count = 0;
>> + unsigned long i;
>>
>> ...
>>
>> - unsigned int i;
>> + unsigned long i;
>
> Maybe I did too much fortran back in the day, but I think the
> expectation is that a variable called "i" has type "int".
>
> This?
t460s: ~/git/linux memory_block_devices2 $ git grep "unsigned long i;" |
wc -l
245
t460s: ~/git/linux memory_block_devices2 $ git grep "int i;" | wc -l
26827
Yes ;)
While it makes sense for the second and third occurrence, I think for
the first one it could be confusing (it's not actually a section number
but a counter for sections_per_block).
I see just now that we can avoid converting the first occurrence
completely. So maybe we should drop changing removable_show() from this
patch.
Cheers!
>
>
>
> s/unsigned long i/unsigned long section_nr/
>
> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c~mm-section-numbers-use-the-type-unsigned-long-fix
> +++ a/drivers/base/memory.c
> @@ -131,17 +131,17 @@ static ssize_t phys_index_show(struct de
> static ssize_t removable_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - unsigned long i, pfn;
> + unsigned long section_nr, pfn;
> int ret = 1;
> struct memory_block *mem = to_memory_block(dev);
>
> if (mem->state != MEM_ONLINE)
> goto out;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < sections_per_block; i++) {
> - if (!present_section_nr(mem->start_section_nr + i))
> + for (section_nr = 0; section_nr < sections_per_block; section_nr++) {
> + if (!present_section_nr(mem->start_section_nr + section_nr))
> continue;
> - pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr + i);
> + pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr + section_nr);
> ret &= is_mem_section_removable(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> }
>
> @@ -695,12 +695,12 @@ static int add_memory_block(unsigned lon
> {
> int ret, section_count = 0;
> struct memory_block *mem;
> - unsigned long i;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
>
> - for (i = base_section_nr;
> - i < base_section_nr + sections_per_block;
> - i++)
> - if (present_section_nr(i))
> + for (section_nr = base_section_nr;
> + section_nr < base_section_nr + sections_per_block;
> + section_nr++)
> + if (present_section_nr(section_nr))
> section_count++;
>
> if (section_count == 0)
> @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *mem
> */
> int __init memory_dev_init(void)
> {
> - unsigned long i;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
> int ret;
> int err;
> unsigned long block_sz;
> @@ -840,9 +840,9 @@ int __init memory_dev_init(void)
> * during boot and have been initialized
> */
> mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex);
> - for (i = 0; i <= __highest_present_section_nr;
> - i += sections_per_block) {
> - err = add_memory_block(i);
> + for (section_nr = 0; section_nr <= __highest_present_section_nr;
> + section_nr += sections_per_block) {
> + err = add_memory_block(section_nr);
> if (!ret)
> ret = err;
> }
> _
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-14 10:01 [PATCH v1 0/6] mm: Further memory block device cleanups David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] mm: Section numbers use the type "unsigned long" David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-14 19:34 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-06-15 8:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-18 1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-18 12:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] drivers/base/memory: Use "unsigned long" for block ids David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mm: Make register_mem_sect_under_node() static David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Rename walk_memory_range() and pass start+size instead of pfns David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Move and simplify walk_memory_blocks() David Hildenbrand
2019-06-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] drivers/base/memory.c: Get rid of find_memory_block_hinted() David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e07449fa-251f-51c7-9ee2-202635c4aef7@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).