From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D294C433ED for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0579961209 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:45:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0579961209 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkB533yv1z308H for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:45:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=QNhOwv8a; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=QNhOwv8a; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkB4W6sXZz2xZB for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:45:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14H7Z8nO026973; Mon, 17 May 2021 03:45:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=oxTAMglpyv24UBEh6mquTjSeDllIQBD4l6+Cm3oSttY=; b=QNhOwv8a/DJnUMR0OcukjQ1PZu/fmt5FHk/uTcy2pwm5CibA8rHZqA87eHuM2BmiWUmc fMHFUSO/HW3kF4N54LKnCenm6ctLgi5vStT9mtImEooMUY179YY5MVTR9+Kk08IstLns tl/w6ja3JEcsQY1xow12JMMfwjL6s7s6HZHR1EQFOXt1DLBdfyejTYzkz7q3N9ennlEr yIfhCdZa+HuSaGJ4ItX5sjzXoUbnGhIx5/8dwLcko0A7AKSVJ3HECY5DSkVQVacmBFcY 8c/Wa1+N2SLIq36OS2nb/EYrkC2CnsQDTAYWVDlXew2XI+9mfzEaRiPBYIHlXb5r+z1+ kQ== Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38km2drfpp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 May 2021 03:45:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14H7hjWX025863; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:58 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38j5x80bnn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:58 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14H7iSQ623134480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:28 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5103E11C058; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5B911C066; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.40.240] (unknown [9.199.40.240]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2021 07:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 213069] New: kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h:147! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] To: Anshuman Khandual , Christophe Leroy , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" References: <4deb5cd5-c713-b020-9143-c74a031e3fd5@csgroup.eu> <7ebc28ad-61e3-ef43-d670-9b80a61268c4@csgroup.eu> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 13:14:54 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 8NTR7gbVZVmRTsV-q01Kmv5NdwaQNC_6 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 8NTR7gbVZVmRTsV-q01Kmv5NdwaQNC_6 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-17_01:2021-05-12, 2021-05-17 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105170052 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 5/17/21 12:55 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 5/17/21 11:25 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> On 5/17/21 11:17 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> +aneesh >>> +linuxppc-dev list >>> >>> Le 17/05/2021 à 07:44, Anshuman Khandual a écrit : >>>> Hello Christophe, >>>> >>>> DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE has now been re-enabled on powerpc recently ? was not >>>> aware about this. From the error log, it failed explicitly on 4K page >>>> size hash config. >>>> >>>> static inline pmd_t hash__pmd_mkhuge(pmd_t pmd) >>>> { >>>>          BUG();        ------> Failed >>>>          return pmd; >>>> } >>>> >>>> static inline pmd_t __pmd_mkhuge(pmd_t pmd) >>>> { >>>>          if (radix_enabled()) >>>>                  return radix__pmd_mkhuge(pmd); >>>>          return hash__pmd_mkhuge(pmd); >>>> } >>>> >>>> pmd_t pfn_pmd(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t pgprot) >>>> { >>>>          unsigned long pmdv; >>>> >>>>          pmdv = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & PTE_RPN_MASK; >>>> >>>>          return __pmd_mkhuge(pmd_set_protbits(__pmd(pmdv), pgprot)); >>>> } >>>> >>>> It seems like on powerpc, where pfn_pmd() makes a huge page but which >>>> is not supported on 4K hash config thus triggering the BUG(). But all >>>> pfn_pmd() call sites inside the debug_vm_pgtable() test are protected >>>> with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE. IIUC unlike powerpc, pfn_pmd() does >>>> not directly make a huge page on other platforms. >>>> >>>> Looking at arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h, all relevant >>>> THP helpers has BUG() or 0 which indicates THP might not be supported >>>> on 4K page size hash config ? >>>> >>>> But looking at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype, it seems like >>>> HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is invariably selected on PPC_BOOK3S_64 >>>> platforms which I assume includes 4K page size hash config as well. >>>> >>>> Is THP some how getting enabled on this 4K page size hash config where >>>> it should not be (thus triggering the BUG) ? OR am I missing something >>>> here. >>>> >>> >> >> We should put those  pfn_pmd()  and pfn_pud() after >> >>     if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) >>         return; >> >> >> On hash with 4K page size, we can't support leaf page table entry and PMD and PUD level. Hence we don't support THP for them. > > But could CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE be enabled on such configs ? > Otherwise, wondering how the BUG() just got triggered there. > yes. We do support THP with radix translation and 4K page size. -aneesh