From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] arm64: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:35:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2333d87-6442-0ddc-ee3d-5fb917600577@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325060828.2662773-4-rppt@kernel.org>
On 2023/3/25 14:08, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
> describe this configuration option.
>
> Update both to actually describe what this option does.
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 7324032af859..cc11cdcf5a00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1487,24 +1487,24 @@ config XEN
> # 16K | 27 | 14 | 13 | 11 |
> # 64K | 29 | 16 | 13 | 13 |
> config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> - int "Maximum zone order" if EXPERT && (ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES)
> + int "Order of maximal physically contiguous allocations" if EXPERT && (ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES)
> default "13" if ARM64_64K_PAGES
> default "11" if ARM64_16K_PAGES
> default "10"
> help
> - The kernel memory allocator divides physically contiguous memory
> - blocks into "zones", where each zone is a power of two number of
> - pages. This option selects the largest power of two that the kernel
> - keeps in the memory allocator. If you need to allocate very large
> - blocks of physically contiguous memory, then you may need to
> - increase this value.
> + The kernel page allocator limits the size of maximal physically
> + contiguous allocations. The limit is called MAX_ORDER and it
> + defines the maximal power of two of number of pages that can be
> + allocated as a single contiguous block. This option allows
> + overriding the default setting when ability to allocate very
> + large blocks of physically contiguous memory is required.
>
> - We make sure that we can allocate up to a HugePage size for each configuration.
> - Hence we have :
> - MAX_ORDER = PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT => PAGE_SHIFT - 3
> + The maximal size of allocation cannot exceed the size of the
> + section, so the value of MAX_ORDER should satisfy
>
> - However for 4K, we choose a higher default value, 10 as opposed to 9, giving us
> - 4M allocations matching the default size used by generic code.
> + MAX_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> +
> + Don't change if unsure.
>
> config UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
> bool "Unmap kernel when running in userspace (aka \"KAISER\")" if EXPERT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 6:08 [PATCH v3 00/14] arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] arm: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-03-29 15:55 ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-04 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-04-04 11:50 ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-12 17:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-18 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2023-04-19 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-19 11:27 ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-25 16:09 ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-27 13:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] arm64: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:35 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] csky: drop ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] ia64: don't allow users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:38 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-04-19 8:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] m68k: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] nios2: " Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] nios2: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] powerpc: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] powerpc: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] sh: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] sh: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] sparc: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25 6:08 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] xtensa: " Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2333d87-6442-0ddc-ee3d-5fb917600577@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).