From: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
PowerPC Mailing List <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
b08248@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evh_bytechan: fix out of bounds accesses
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:17:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5b585dffdaf0608e6d5d1cfac288d02e09d384d.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <726a71ce-b9e6-cec4-a4d0-ec6a8c604989@kernel.org>
On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 19:13 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 1/13/20 7:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > I would prefer that ev_byte_channel_send() is updated to access only
> > 'count' bytes. If that means adding a memcpy to the
> > ev_byte_channel_send() itself, then so be it. Trying to figure out how
> > to stuff n bytes into 4 32-
> > bit registers is probably not worth the effort.
>
> Looks like ev_byte_channel_receive() has the same bug, but in reverse.
It only has one user, which always passes in a 16-byte buffer.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 7:39 [PATCH] evh_bytechan: fix out of bounds accesses Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-13 12:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-01-13 13:48 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-13 14:34 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-01-13 15:48 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-14 1:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-01-14 9:18 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-01-14 11:01 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-13 16:03 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-13 20:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-14 1:10 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-14 1:13 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-14 1:17 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2020-01-14 6:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-15 12:33 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-01-15 13:25 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-15 19:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-15 20:01 ` Scott Wood
2020-01-16 0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-20 23:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-25 9:54 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-02-25 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26 9:43 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-01-16 2:29 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-14 8:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-14 11:53 ` Timur Tabi
2020-01-14 12:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-17 13:14 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5b585dffdaf0608e6d5d1cfac288d02e09d384d.camel@redhat.com \
--to=swood@redhat.com \
--cc=b08248@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=york.sun@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).