From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B577C4CEC5 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA6A20684 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:20:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BDA6A20684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Tgsw1lVVzF4Db for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:20:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TgnZ3TdjzF4XR for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:17:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8CE7X5k006871; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:16:57 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uyp18ubpt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:16:54 -0400 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8CE7tkK007616; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:16:51 -0400 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uyp18ubks-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:16:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8CE5ZPb008328; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:46 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2uv467cdks-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:46 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8CEGj7M23921038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:46 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E8913605E; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678BC136066; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.32.243] (unknown [9.199.32.243]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:16:43 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powperc/mm: read TLB Block Invalidate Characteristics To: Laurent Dufour , mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com References: <20190830120712.22971-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <20190830120712.22971-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 19:46:41 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190830120712.22971-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-12_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909120149 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 8/30/19 5:37 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote: > The PAPR document specifies the TLB Block Invalidate Characteristics which > is telling which couple base page size / page size is supported by the > H_BLOCK_REMOVE hcall. > > A new set of feature is added to the mmu_psize_def structure to record per > base page size which page size is supported by H_BLOCK_REMOVE. > > A new init service is added to read the characteristics. The size of the > buffer is set to twice the number of known page size, plus 10 bytes to > ensure we have enough place. > So this is not really the base page size/actual page size combination. This is related to H_BLOCK_REMOVE hcall, block size supported by that HCALL and what page size combination is supported with that specific block size. We should add that TLB block invalidate characteristics format in this patch. > Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h | 3 + > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h > index 23b83d3593e2..675895dfe39f 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h > @@ -12,11 +12,14 @@ > * sllp : is a bit mask with the value of SLB L || LP to be or'ed > * directly to a slbmte "vsid" value > * penc : is the HPTE encoding mask for the "LP" field: > + * hblk : H_BLOCK_REMOVE supported block size for this page size in > + * segment who's base page size is that page size. > * > */ > struct mmu_psize_def { > unsigned int shift; /* number of bits */ > int penc[MMU_PAGE_COUNT]; /* HPTE encoding */ > + int hblk[MMU_PAGE_COUNT]; /* H_BLOCK_REMOVE support */ > unsigned int tlbiel; /* tlbiel supported for that page size */ > unsigned long avpnm; /* bits to mask out in AVPN in the HPTE */ > union { > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c > index 4f76e5f30c97..375e19b3cf53 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c > @@ -1311,6 +1311,113 @@ static void do_block_remove(unsigned long number, struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch, > (void)call_block_remove(pix, param, true); > } > > +static inline void __init set_hblk_bloc_size(int bpsize, int psize, > + unsigned int block_size) > +{ > + struct mmu_psize_def *def = &mmu_psize_defs[bpsize]; > + > + if (block_size > def->hblk[psize]) > + def->hblk[psize] = block_size; > +} > + > +static inline void __init check_lp_set_hblk(unsigned int lp, > + unsigned int block_size) > +{ > + unsigned int bpsize, psize; > + > + > + /* First, check the L bit, if not set, this means 4K */ > + if ((lp & 0x80) == 0) { What is that 0x80? We should have #define for most of those. > + set_hblk_bloc_size(MMU_PAGE_4K, MMU_PAGE_4K, block_size); > + return; > + } > + > + /* PAPR says to look at bits 2-7 (0 = MSB) */ > + lp &= 0x3f; Also convert that to #define? > + for (bpsize = 0; bpsize < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; bpsize++) { > + struct mmu_psize_def *def = &mmu_psize_defs[bpsize]; > + > + for (psize = 0; psize < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; psize++) { > + if (def->penc[psize] == lp) { > + set_hblk_bloc_size(bpsize, psize, block_size); > + return; > + } > + } > + } > +} > + > +#define SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_TOKEN 50 > +#define SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH (MMU_PAGE_COUNT*2 + 10) > +static int __init read_tlbbi_characteristics(void) > +{ > + int call_status; > + unsigned char local_buffer[SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH]; > + int len, idx, bpsize; > + > + if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_BLOCK_REMOVE)) { > + pr_info("H_BLOCK_REMOVE is not supported"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + memset(local_buffer, 0, SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH); > + > + spin_lock(&rtas_data_buf_lock); > + memset(rtas_data_buf, 0, RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE); > + call_status = rtas_call(rtas_token("ibm,get-system-parameter"), 3, 1, > + NULL, > + SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_TOKEN, > + __pa(rtas_data_buf), > + RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE); > + memcpy(local_buffer, rtas_data_buf, SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH); > + local_buffer[SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH - 1] = '\0'; > + spin_unlock(&rtas_data_buf_lock); > + > + if (call_status != 0) { > + pr_warn("%s %s Error calling get-system-parameter (0x%x)\n", > + __FILE__, __func__, call_status); > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* > + * The first two (2) bytes of the data in the buffer are the length of > + * the returned data, not counting these first two (2) bytes. > + */ > + len = local_buffer[0] * 256 + local_buffer[1] + 2; > + if (len >= SPLPAR_TLB_BIC_MAXLENGTH) { > + pr_warn("%s too large returned buffer %d", __func__, len); > + return 0; > + } > + > + idx = 2; > + while (idx < len) { > + unsigned int block_size = local_buffer[idx++]; > + unsigned int npsize; > + > + if (!block_size) > + break; > + > + block_size = 1 << block_size; > + if (block_size != 8) > + /* We only support 8 bytes size TLB invalidate buffer */ > + pr_warn("Unsupported H_BLOCK_REMOVE block size : %d\n", > + block_size); > + > + for (npsize = local_buffer[idx++]; npsize > 0; npsize--) > + check_lp_set_hblk((unsigned int) local_buffer[idx++], > + block_size); > + } > + > + for (bpsize = 0; bpsize < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; bpsize++) > + for (idx = 0; idx < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; idx++) > + if (mmu_psize_defs[bpsize].hblk[idx]) > + pr_info("H_BLOCK_REMOVE supports base psize:%d psize:%d block size:%d", > + bpsize, idx, > + mmu_psize_defs[bpsize].hblk[idx]); > + > + return 0; > +} > +machine_arch_initcall(pseries, read_tlbbi_characteristics); > + Why a machine_arch_initcall() ? Can't we do this similar to how we do segment-page-size parsing from device tree? Also this should be hash translation mode specific. > /* > * Take a spinlock around flushes to avoid bouncing the hypervisor tlbie > * lock. >