From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BCAC432C0 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4992B2067D for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="DnacKCm2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4992B2067D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47JtZz182bzDr7K for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 08:52:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com (client-ip=216.228.121.64; helo=hqemgate15.nvidia.com; envelope-from=jhubbard@nvidia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="DnacKCm2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com (hqemgate15.nvidia.com [216.228.121.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47JtXh1mGGzDr5y for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 08:50:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate15.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:50:32 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:50:35 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:50:35 -0800 Received: from [10.2.168.213] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:50:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/24] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines To: Jan Kara References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121071354.456618-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121080356.GA24784@lst.de> <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com> <20191121094908.GB18190@quack2.suse.cz> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: John Hubbard Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:47:47 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191121094908.GB18190@quack2.suse.cz> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1574373032; bh=kU5UGk7rYta5qBqyhgDE8hfKXijiGAD2NIzjPl1Hld4=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DnacKCm2GFnxzRow8XHHjnv9A3uMI6LI6SiIGhg9bKcp76MqPQ8kF1M27y/KaRAbw xxowc8Q3DyiD2kAcAm0nQ17JpX8GvIrqJ8uSjriDnOLoj/h1UR33AwThcGRh+kdiFs sIZ9xwXRicfai3imhi7lfxcAqYrkI8TWeVUm4/7D0SDPmiW6FMWhSFSQx92VV4EoOz XFN+VtOdWxZk+dXcyMd50CRCI5bozfozwO/LAtNo36xbQ2gRR/BBiAeTLEx8hKdZSK Fx3jsqI8EasMtw1tkRf01vJb8NeCgZkxRIPz/M0TVfxHrLLklLoxP+jEnZwmUVejAC k2q6xFFz7w7hA== X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Hocko , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Dave Chinner , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig , Jonathan Corbet , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , Vlastimil Babka , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Al Viro , Dan Williams , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Karlsson , Jens Axboe , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Daniel Vetter , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" , Mike Kravetz Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11/21/19 1:49 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 21-11-19 00:29:59, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 11/21/19 12:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Otherwise this looks fine and might be a worthwhile cleanup to feed >>> Andrew for 5.5 independent of the gut of the changes. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >>> >> >> Thanks for the reviews! Say, it sounds like your view here is that this >> series should be targeted at 5.6 (not 5.5), is that what you have in mind? >> And get the preparatory patches (1-9, and maybe even 10-16) into 5.5? > > Yeah, actually I feel the same. The merge window is going to open on Sunday > and the series isn't still fully baked and happily sitting in linux-next > (and larger changes should really sit in linux-next for at least a week, > preferably two, before the merge window opens to get some reasonable test > coverage). So I'd take out the independent easy patches that are already > reviewed, get them merged into Andrew's (or whatever other appropriate > tree) now so that they get at least a week of testing in linux-next before > going upstream. And the more involved bits will have to wait for 5.6 - > which means let's just continue working on them as we do now because > ideally in 4 weeks we should have them ready with all the reviews so that > they can be picked up and integrated into linux-next. > > Honza OK, thanks for spelling it out. I'll shift over to getting the easy patches prepared for 5.5, for now. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA