linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:22:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed82fe3e1003251722o784f6b96paf140e76cfdaf93@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100325.175343.706994262324563953.imp@bsdimp.com>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:53 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> Most !linux systems are not GPL'd. =A0They are BSDL, primarily, or some
> private license between seller and buyer. =A0In any event, other OSes
> likely won't have the GPL issue.

You're probably right.

> But I'm confused. =A0If you can't distribute the binary firmware, why
> can you distribute the hex dump of the firmware?

We can distribute the binary firmware.  We just can't embed it in the
Linux kernel, since it's not GPL.  So it needs to be delivered to the
kernel at boot time via a non-GPL mechanism.  The device tree is one
option.  An initrd is another.  The problem Freescale has is that
modifying our BSP to use an initrd is not a trivial task, and it's a
lot more complicated than using the device tree.  For example, there's
the possibility that U-Boot and Linux will use different microcode
binaries, and it also means that the initrd becomes SOC-specific.

--=20
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-26  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-23 21:42 [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware Timur Tabi
2010-03-24  6:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 12:05   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 17:00     ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-03-24 17:07       ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 17:31         ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 18:10           ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 18:21             ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-24 18:25             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 18:24           ` M. Warner Losh
2010-03-24 18:31             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25  1:49           ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-03-25 14:42             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 16:10               ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 16:34                 ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 16:46                   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:23                     ` Rafal Jaworowski
2010-03-25 23:53               ` M. Warner Losh
2010-03-26  0:22                 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2010-03-25 15:16             ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 15:29               ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-25 16:16                 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 16:36                   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 16:50                     ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 16:59                     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 17:03                       ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 17:35                         ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 18:05                           ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 19:53                           ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 20:04                             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 21:54                               ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 22:19                                 ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 21:39                             ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 22:47                               ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 21:22                       ` David Gibson
2010-03-26  1:26                     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 15:17                       ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:20                         ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:39                           ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:44                             ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:48                               ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:56                                 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:58                                 ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-26 19:07                                   ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:48                             ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-24 18:27         ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed82fe3e1003251722o784f6b96paf140e76cfdaf93@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=imp@bsdimp.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).