From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD8DC43603 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA7A24691 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:17:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1AA7A24691 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47d7D16nxhzDqXd for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:17:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sandipan@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47d6gQ0ntwzDqb1 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:52:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBI7qShq039200 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 02:52:46 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wye0643ye-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 02:52:46 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:43 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:39 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xBI7qcXT43188256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:38 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51218AE04D; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D7EAE053; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fir03.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.121.59.65]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:52:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Sandipan Das To: shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v15 15/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Improve checks to determine pkey support Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:21:48 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19121807-0008-0000-0000-000003421461 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19121807-0009-0000-0000-00004A6227FE Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-18_01:2019-12-17,2019-12-18 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=2 mlxlogscore=862 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912180063 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msuchanek@suse.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Ram Pai For the pkeys subsystem to work, both the CPU and the kernel need to have support. So, additionally check if the kernel supports pkeys apart from the CPU feature checks. cc: Dave Hansen cc: Florian Weimer Signed-off-by: Ram Pai Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 7 +++-- 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h index 5de06d3a81de..43299435f24c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ extern void abort_hooks(void); __attribute__((noinline)) int read_ptr(int *ptr); void expected_pkey_fault(int pkey); +int sys_pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_val); +int sys_pkey_free(unsigned long pkey); #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */ #include "pkey-x86.h" @@ -187,4 +189,32 @@ static inline u32 *siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(siginfo_t *si) #endif } +static inline int kernel_has_pkeys(void) +{ + /* try allocating a key and see if it succeeds */ + int ret = sys_pkey_alloc(0, 0); + if (ret <= 0) { + return 0; + } + sys_pkey_free(ret); + return 1; +} + +static inline int is_pkeys_supported(void) +{ + /* check if the cpu supports pkeys */ + if (!cpu_has_pkeys()) { + dprintf1("SKIP: %s: no CPU support\n", __func__); + return 0; + } + + /* check if the kernel supports pkeys */ + if (!kernel_has_pkeys()) { + dprintf1("SKIP: %s: no kernel support\n", __func__); + return 0; + } + + return 1; +} + #endif /* _PKEYS_HELPER_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h index 5ced9c58fa4a..a43d7be85a27 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h @@ -63,8 +63,9 @@ static inline void __write_pkey_reg(pkey_reg_t pkey_reg) pkey_reg); } -static inline int cpu_has_pku(void) +static inline int cpu_has_pkeys(void) { + /* No simple way to determine this */ return 1; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h index bb2d4dfcacd5..e5fdee39a7d8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static inline void __cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, #define X86_FEATURE_PKU (1<<3) /* Protection Keys for Userspace */ #define X86_FEATURE_OSPKE (1<<4) /* OS Protection Keys Enable */ -static inline int cpu_has_pku(void) +static inline int cpu_has_pkeys(void) { unsigned int eax; unsigned int ebx; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c index 8d90cfe2c9bd..7bceb98662c1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c @@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey) int size = PAGE_SIZE; int sret; - if (cpu_has_pku()) { + if (cpu_has_pkeys()) { dprintf1("SKIP: %s: no CPU support\n", __func__); return; } @@ -1446,12 +1446,13 @@ void pkey_setup_shadow(void) int main(void) { int nr_iterations = 22; + int pkeys_supported = is_pkeys_supported(); setup_handlers(); - printf("has pku: %d\n", cpu_has_pku()); + printf("has pkeys: %d\n", pkeys_supported); - if (!cpu_has_pku()) { + if (!pkeys_supported) { int size = PAGE_SIZE; int *ptr; -- 2.17.1