From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA36EC433EF for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275D260EE7 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 275D260EE7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HSfKt029qz302D for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:10:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=IsIZcsWR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=IsIZcsWR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HSfK128zgz2yMH for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:09:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19BB01J4025744; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:09:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=arQSQCAv8lW3Ss7oeZqk+VMGoUu3E2m5PdKWLOGDHzM=; b=IsIZcsWROLdLcdbamY8V6WbsrQnaeOrUone8emnC9lrSApaxN7SRLud1FfoHXyFEGRNT K27A9bPxxQj0bqgfC6KA+is0EuKQz0+CtIKnXa/afStTds7gA59KJ27sK2BCmvp2/Xcw Y//MMtOKJtkyoKyKz3G0DAWpGmhWb3ZFKhSjFCQeaU29YYcHKhpbcFi68p3l0RzzlYOc AzlHvatc9Tm/tQFOxmxsm9U/MRxpSrCMDF2Bc3u4k06MgB0CTfompDWzOf23JRAdnUln d8iAWh93PeSEsSL0nZcP/McKdfKObPpVApKTMtX9krZRHOUINqAolFbVhHr8RLkICyh9 1g== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bmhhuxn44-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:09:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19BD2eRO009184; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:09:30 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bk2bj4yuf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:09:29 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 19BD3pUo33817048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:03:51 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FF4A4066; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:09:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B02A4068; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e8dccbcc-2adc-11b2-a85c-bc1f33b9b810.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.84.42]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [V3 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add instruction and data address registers to extended regs To: Athira Rajeev , mpe@ellerman.id.au, acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org References: <20211007065505.27809-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: kajoljain Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:39:18 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211007065505.27809-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: C8sN5U5SPyOcG0hmXEEgorvk7aX3ejpY X-Proofpoint-GUID: C8sN5U5SPyOcG0hmXEEgorvk7aX3ejpY X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-11_04,2021-10-07_02,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110110076 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 10/7/21 12:25 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote: > Patch set adds PMU registers namely Sampled Instruction Address Register > (SIAR) and Sampled Data Address Register (SDAR) as part of extended regs > in PowerPC. These registers provides the instruction/data address and > adding these to extended regs helps in debug purposes. > > Patch 1/4 and 2/4 refactors the existing macro definition of > PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 and PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 to make it more > readable. > Patch 3/4 adds SIAR and SDAR as part of the extended regs mask. > Patch 4/4 includes perf tools side changes to add the SPRs to > sample_reg_mask to use with -I? option. > > Changelog: > Change from v2 -> v3: > Addressed review comments from Michael Ellerman > - Fixed the macro definition to use "unsigned long long" > which otherwise will cause build error with perf on > 32-bit. > - Added Reviewed-by from Daniel Axtens for patch3. > > Change from v1 -> v2: > Addressed review comments from Michael Ellerman > - Refactored the perf reg extended mask value macros for > PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 and PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 to > make it more readable. Also moved PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX > along with enum definition similar to PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX. > > Athira Rajeev (4): > powerpc/perf: Refactor the code definition of perf reg extended mask > tools/perf: Refactor the code definition of perf reg extended mask in > tools side header file > powerpc/perf: Expose instruction and data address registers as part of > extended regs > tools/perf: Add perf tools support to expose instruction and data > address registers as part of extended regs Patch-set looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain Thanks, Kajol Jain > > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 28 ++++++++++++------- > arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 4 +++ > .../arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 28 ++++++++++++------- > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 2 ++ > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >