From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com,
jbaron@akamai.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com,
hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
jeyu@kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:06:12 +0200
Message-ID: <20191025100612.GB5671@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191025084300.GG4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:43:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But none of that explains why apply_alternatives() is also delayed.
>
> So I'm very tempted to just revert that patchset for doing it all
> wrong.
And I've done just that. This includes Josh's validation patch, the
revert and my klp_appy_relocations_add() patches with the removal of
module_disable_ro().
Josh, can you test or give me clue on how to test? I need to run a few
errands today, but I'll try and have a poke either tonight or tomorrow.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/rwx
After this it is waiting for Mark's argh64 patches to land:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021163426.9408-5-mark.rutland@arm.com
And then we can go and delete module_disable_ro() entirely -- hooray!
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191018073525.768931536@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20191018074634.801435443@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20191021135312.jbbxsuipxldocdjk@treble>
[not found] ` <20191021141402.GI1817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <20191023114835.GT1817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2019-10-23 17:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-25 6:44 ` Petr Mladek
2019-10-25 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-25 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-10-25 13:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-26 1:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-28 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-28 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-25 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191025100612.GB5671@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Live-Patching Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/0 live-patching/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 live-patching live-patching/ https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching \
live-patching@vger.kernel.org
public-inbox-index live-patching
Example config snippet for mirrors
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.live-patching
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git