live-patching.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	joe.lawrence@redhat.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, nstange@suse.de,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] s390/unwind: prepare the unwinding interface for reliable stack traces
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2019 10:56:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106095601.29986-4-mbenes@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106095601.29986-1-mbenes@suse.cz>

The reliable stack traces support will require to perform more actions
and some tasks differently. Add a new parameter to respective functions
and propagate it where appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  3 ++-
 arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h     | 18 ++++++++++--------
 arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c       |  5 +++--
 arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c      |  2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c      |  2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c       | 19 +++++++++++--------
 arch/s390/oprofile/init.c          |  2 +-
 7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 0ae4bbf7779c..f033bb70a8db 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ struct stack_info {
 
 const char *stack_type_name(enum stack_type type);
 int get_stack_info(unsigned long sp, struct task_struct *task,
-		   struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask);
+		   struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask,
+		   bool unwind_reliable);
 
 static inline bool on_stack(struct stack_info *info,
 			    unsigned long addr, size_t len)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
index eaaefeceef6f..4c36e200404e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ struct unwind_state {
 };
 
 void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
-		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long first_frame);
-bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state);
+		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long first_frame,
+		    bool unwind_reliable);
+bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state, bool unwind_reliable);
 unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct unwind_state *state);
 
 static inline bool unwind_done(struct unwind_state *state)
@@ -59,10 +60,11 @@ static inline bool unwind_error(struct unwind_state *state)
 static inline void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state,
 				struct task_struct *task,
 				struct pt_regs *regs,
-				unsigned long sp)
+				unsigned long sp,
+				bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	sp = sp ? : get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
-	__unwind_start(state, task, regs, sp);
+	__unwind_start(state, task, regs, sp, unwind_reliable);
 }
 
 static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
@@ -70,10 +72,10 @@ static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
 	return unwind_done(state) ? NULL : state->regs;
 }
 
-#define unwind_for_each_frame(state, task, regs, first_frame)	\
-	for (unwind_start(state, task, regs, first_frame);	\
-	     !unwind_done(state);				\
-	     unwind_next_frame(state))
+#define unwind_for_each_frame(state, task, regs, first_frame, unwind_reliable)	\
+	for (unwind_start(state, task, regs, first_frame, unwind_reliable);	\
+	     !unwind_done(state);						\
+	     unwind_next_frame(state, unwind_reliable))
 
 static inline void unwind_init(void) {}
 static inline void unwind_module_init(struct module *mod, void *orc_ip,
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 34bdc60c0b11..1ee19e6336cd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ static bool in_restart_stack(unsigned long sp, struct stack_info *info)
 }
 
 int get_stack_info(unsigned long sp, struct task_struct *task,
-		   struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask)
+		   struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask,
+		   bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	if (!sp)
 		goto unknown;
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
 	printk("Call Trace:\n");
 	if (!task)
 		task = current;
-	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, NULL, (unsigned long) stack)
+	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, NULL, (unsigned long) stack, false)
 		printk(state.reliable ? " [<%016lx>] %pSR \n" :
 					"([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n",
 		       state.ip, (void *) state.ip);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c
index fcb6c2e92b07..7e81db0883e1 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 {
 	struct unwind_state state;
 
-	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, current, regs, 0)
+	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, current, regs, 0, false)
 		perf_callchain_store(entry, state.ip);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c
index f8fc4f8aef9b..751c136172f7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
 	struct unwind_state state;
 	unsigned long addr;
 
-	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, regs, 0) {
+	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, regs, 0, false) {
 		addr = unwind_get_return_address(&state);
 		if (!addr || !consume_entry(cookie, addr, false))
 			break;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c b/arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c
index 96da99ec7b59..092626f4e7c6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static bool update_stack_info(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long sp)
 	unsigned long *mask = &state->stack_mask;
 
 	/* New stack pointer leaves the current stack */
-	if (get_stack_info(sp, state->task, info, mask) != 0 ||
+	if (get_stack_info(sp, state->task, info, mask, false) != 0 ||
 	    !on_stack(info, sp, sizeof(struct stack_frame)))
 		/* 'sp' does not point to a valid stack */
 		return false;
@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ static bool unwind_use_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static bool unwind_use_frame(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long sp)
+static bool unwind_use_frame(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long sp,
+			     bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	struct stack_frame *sf;
 	unsigned long ip;
@@ -100,7 +101,8 @@ static bool unwind_use_frame(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long sp)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static bool unwind_look_for_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
+static bool unwind_look_for_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+				 bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
 	struct pt_regs *regs;
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@ static bool unwind_look_for_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
 	return false;
 }
 
-bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
+bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state, bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	struct stack_frame *sf;
 	unsigned long sp;
@@ -136,15 +138,16 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 
 	/* Non-zero back-chain points to the previous frame */
 	if (likely(sp))
-		return unwind_use_frame(state, sp);
+		return unwind_use_frame(state, sp, unwind_reliable);
 
 	/* No back-chain, look for a pt_regs structure */
-	return unwind_look_for_regs(state);
+	return unwind_look_for_regs(state, unwind_reliable);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_next_frame);
 
 void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
-		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp)
+		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp,
+		    bool unwind_reliable)
 {
 	struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
 	unsigned long *mask = &state->stack_mask;
@@ -163,7 +166,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 	}
 
 	/* Get current stack pointer and initialize stack info */
-	if (get_stack_info(sp, task, info, mask) != 0 ||
+	if (get_stack_info(sp, task, info, mask, unwind_reliable) != 0 ||
 	    !on_stack(info, sp, sizeof(struct stack_frame))) {
 		/* Something is wrong with the stack pointer */
 		info->type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
diff --git a/arch/s390/oprofile/init.c b/arch/s390/oprofile/init.c
index 7441857df51b..59d736f46cbc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/oprofile/init.c
+++ b/arch/s390/oprofile/init.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static void s390_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int depth)
 {
 	struct unwind_state state;
 
-	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, current, regs, 0) {
+	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, current, regs, 0, false) {
 		if (depth-- == 0)
 			break;
 		oprofile_add_trace(state.ip);
-- 
2.23.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06  9:55 [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model Miroslav Benes
2019-11-06  9:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] s390/unwind: drop unnecessary code around calling ftrace_graph_ret_addr() Miroslav Benes
2019-11-28 16:51   ` Vasily Gorbik
2019-11-06  9:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] s390/unwind: split unwind_next_frame() to several functions Miroslav Benes
2019-11-06  9:56 ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
2019-11-06  9:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model Miroslav Benes
2019-11-29  7:41   ` Vasily Gorbik
2019-11-29  7:41     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] s390/unwind: add stack pointer alignment sanity checks Vasily Gorbik
2019-11-29 18:16       ` Miroslav Benes
2019-11-29  7:41     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model Vasily Gorbik
2019-11-29 18:16       ` Miroslav Benes
2019-11-29 18:16     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] " Miroslav Benes
2019-12-11 13:45       ` Libor Pechacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106095601.29986-4-mbenes@suse.cz \
    --to=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).