From: Joe Lawrence <email@example.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <email@example.com>,
Miroslav Benes <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Petr Mladek <email@example.com>,
Nicolai Stange <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Jason Baron <email@example.com>, Gabriel Gomes <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Alice Ferrazzi <email@example.com>,
Michael Matz <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Kamalesh Babulal <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: Live patching MC at LPC2020?
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:52:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331205204.GA7388@redhat.com> (raw)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:20:52PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> oh well, it sounds a bit awkward to be talking about any conference plans
> for this year given how the corona things are untangling in the world, but
> LPC planning committee has issued (a) statement about Covid-19 (b) call
> for papers (as originally planned) nevertheless. Please see:
> for details.
> Under the asumption that this Covid nuisance is over by that time and
> travel is possible (and safe) again -- do we want to eventually submit a
> livepatching miniconf proposal again?
> I believe there are still kernel related topics on our plate (like revised
> handling of the modules that has been agreed on in Lisbon and Petr has
> started to work on, the C parsing effort by Nicolai, etc), and at the same
> time I'd really like to include the new kids on the block too -- the
> userspace livepatching folks (CCing those I know for sure are working on
First off, I hope everyone is riding out COVID-19 as well as possible,
considering all that's happening.
As for LPC mini-conf topics, I'd be interested in (at least):
- Petr's per-object livepatch POC
- klp-convert status
- objtool hacking
- Nicolai's klp-ccp status
- arch update (arm64, etc)
> So, please if you have any opinion one way or the other, please speak up.
> Depending on the feedback, I will be fine handling the logistics of the
> miniconf submission as last year (together with Josh I guess?) unless
> someone else wants to step up and volunter himself :)
> (*) which is totally unclear, yes -- for example goverment in my country
> has been talking for border closure lasting for 1+ years ... but it
> all depends on how things develop of course).
Hmm, all good points. Some conferences have gone virtual to cope with
necessary cancellations, but who knows what things will look like even
at the end of August. Perhaps we can still do something remotely if the
conditions dictate it. But my vote would be yes, and let's see what
topics interest folks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 13:20 Live patching MC at LPC2020? Jiri Kosina
2020-03-30 14:01 ` Michael Matz
2020-03-31 20:52 ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
2020-04-08 10:22 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2020-04-14 10:03 ` Alice ferrazzi
2020-06-25 6:59 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-27 5:43 ` Alice
2020-06-30 21:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-01 13:13 ` Michael Matz
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).