Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:09:52PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Implement a check_reliability() function that will contain checks for the
> presence of various features and conditions that can render the stack trace
> unreliable.

This looks good to me with one minor stylistic thing:

> +/*
> + * Special functions where the stack trace is unreliable.
> + */
> +static struct function_range	special_functions[] = {
> +	{ 0, 0 }
> +};

Might be good to put a comment here saying that this is terminating the
list rather than detecting a NULL function pointer:

	{ /* sentinel */ }

is a common idiom for that.

Given that it's a fixed array we could also...

> +	for (func = special_functions; func->start; func++) {
> +		if (pc >= func->start && pc < func->end)

...do these as

	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(special_functions); i++) 

so you don't need something like that, though that gets awkward when you
have to write out special_functions[i].field a lot.

So many different potential colours for the bikeshed!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]