From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: gor@linux.ibm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
joe.lawrence@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hca@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func()
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:05:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922110836.065940560@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210922110506.703075504@infradead.org
Instead of frobbing around with scheduler internals, use the shiny new
task_try_func() interface.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
+++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include "core.h"
#include "patch.h"
#include "transition.h"
-#include "../sched/sched.h"
#define MAX_STACK_ENTRIES 100
#define STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE 128
@@ -240,7 +239,7 @@ static int klp_check_stack_func(struct k
* Determine whether it's safe to transition the task to the target patch state
* by looking for any to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched functions on its stack.
*/
-static int klp_check_stack(struct task_struct *task, char *err_buf)
+static int klp_check_stack(struct task_struct *task, const char **oldname)
{
static unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK_ENTRIES];
struct klp_object *obj;
@@ -248,12 +247,8 @@ static int klp_check_stack(struct task_s
int ret, nr_entries;
ret = stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable(task, entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries));
- if (ret < 0) {
- snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
- "%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",
- __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
nr_entries = ret;
klp_for_each_object(klp_transition_patch, obj) {
@@ -262,11 +257,8 @@ static int klp_check_stack(struct task_s
klp_for_each_func(obj, func) {
ret = klp_check_stack_func(func, entries, nr_entries);
if (ret) {
- snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
- "%s: %s:%d is sleeping on function %s\n",
- __func__, task->comm, task->pid,
- func->old_name);
- return ret;
+ *oldname = func->old_name;
+ return -EADDRINUSE;
}
}
}
@@ -274,6 +266,22 @@ static int klp_check_stack(struct task_s
return 0;
}
+static int klp_check_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (task_curr(task))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ ret = klp_check_stack(task, arg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
+ task->patch_state = klp_target_state;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Try to safely switch a task to the target patch state. If it's currently
* running, or it's sleeping on a to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched function, or
@@ -281,13 +289,8 @@ static int klp_check_stack(struct task_s
*/
static bool klp_try_switch_task(struct task_struct *task)
{
- static char err_buf[STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE];
- struct rq *rq;
- struct rq_flags flags;
+ const char *old_name;
int ret;
- bool success = false;
-
- err_buf[0] = '\0';
/* check if this task has already switched over */
if (task->patch_state == klp_target_state)
@@ -305,36 +308,23 @@ static bool klp_try_switch_task(struct t
* functions. If all goes well, switch the task to the target patch
* state.
*/
- rq = task_rq_lock(task, &flags);
-
- if (task_running(rq, task) && task != current) {
- snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
- "%s: %s:%d is running\n", __func__, task->comm,
- task->pid);
- goto done;
+ ret = task_try_func(task, klp_check_task, &old_name);
+ switch (ret) {
+ case -EBUSY:
+ pr_debug("%s: %s:%d is running\n",
+ __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
+ break;
+ case -EINVAL:
+ pr_debug("%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",
+ __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
+ break;
+ case -EADDRINUSE:
+ pr_debug("%s: %s:%d is sleeping on function %s\n",
+ __func__, task->comm, task->pid, old_name);
+ break;
}
- ret = klp_check_stack(task, err_buf);
- if (ret)
- goto done;
-
- success = true;
-
- clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
- task->patch_state = klp_target_state;
-
-done:
- task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &flags);
-
- /*
- * Due to console deadlock issues, pr_debug() can't be used while
- * holding the task rq lock. Instead we have to use a temporary buffer
- * and print the debug message after releasing the lock.
- */
- if (err_buf[0] != '\0')
- pr_debug("%s", err_buf);
-
- return success;
+ return !ret;
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 11:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched,rcu: Rework try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Fix task_try_func() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-23 12:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func() Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Simplify wake_up_*idle*() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,livepatch: Use wake_up_if_idle() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 13:05 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-09-23 12:19 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 19:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 12:10 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-24 18:57 ` Joel Savitz
2021-09-27 14:33 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 13:14 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-24 7:33 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210922110836.065940560@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).