From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59535C433E7 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 22:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE3E22249 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 22:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ILEYsnC7" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727489AbgJNWPO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:15:14 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:57605 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726747AbgJNWPO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:15:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602713713; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JlJsaBWhmIzvkxrz8wAnmAMQ4TeEmSvfpLXmVAXHzMY=; b=ILEYsnC7tJwifeSQcaA1RRgOfpvGF88aYTwtJrVRcvxWRQ60kLLh1wXJauTigRkF/FZ2vT DxMN3VdO1YmPq8LFUs6P4MK6BDoC9buEMnOmSuee9FIDutH7WsbXm7dH0JH/akduonk4Mx qcNIaN+5iH0oX9aJeXx9nDYINTfoR3k= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-569-PGFUK4zOOPKzHHMc66q4tw-1; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:15:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PGFUK4zOOPKzHHMc66q4tw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748F61007464; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 22:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.197] (ovpn-116-197.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.197]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA0E76666; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 22:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: Do not check order when using "comm" for dmesg checking To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Miroslav Benes , jpoimboe@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org References: <20200827110709.26824-1-mbenes@suse.cz> <20200827132058.GA24622@redhat.com> From: Joe Lawrence Message-ID: <27dcc2b9-1ff3-1b18-bf90-ecdf0b8e96d8@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:15:07 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org On 10/14/20 5:53 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Joe Lawrence wrote: > >>>> Acked-by: Joe Lawrence >>>> >>>> And not so important for selftests, but helpful for backporting efforts: >>>> >>>> Fixes: 2f3f651f3756 ("selftests/livepatch: Use "comm" instead of "diff" for >>>> dmesg") >>> >>> I've added the Fixes: tag and applied to for-5.9/upstream-fixes. Thanks, >>> >> >> Hi Jiri, >> >> I was looking at a list of livepatching commits that went into 5.9 for >> backporting and was wondering if we ever merged this one? >> >> It's not a show-stopper, but would be nice to get this one in for 5.10 if >> possible. > > Hi Joe, > > it was not enough of a trigger to actually send 5.9-rc pull request. But > in cases like this, for-5.x/upstream-fixes branch gets included in 5.x+1 > pull request. So it absolutely will land in 5.10. > Ah ok, I agree holding onto that one that makes sense. The branch name threw me off, so I thought I'd ping. Thanks, -- Joe