From: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ftrace: do CPU checking after preemption disabled
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:18:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c07848-c1e1-79f1-8356-4310c1bae037@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a8e8d73-b508-f90b-0d82-eb2da45a720e@linux.alibaba.com>
With CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT we observed reports like:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
caller is perf_ftrace_function_call+0x6f/0x2e0
CPU: 1 PID: 680 Comm: a.out Not tainted
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf
check_preemption_disabled+0x104/0x110
? optimize_nops.isra.7+0x230/0x230
? text_poke_bp_batch+0x9f/0x310
perf_ftrace_function_call+0x6f/0x2e0
...
__text_poke+0x5/0x620
text_poke_bp_batch+0x9f/0x310
This telling us the CPU could be changed after task is preempted, and
the checking on CPU before preemption will be invalid.
Since now ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() will help to disable the
preemption, this patch just do the checking after trylock() to address
the issue.
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
index 6aed10e..fba8cb7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -441,13 +441,13 @@ void perf_trace_buf_update(void *record, u16 type)
if (!rcu_is_watching())
return;
- if ((unsigned long)ops->private != smp_processor_id())
- return;
-
bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
if (bit < 0)
return;
+ if ((unsigned long)ops->private != smp_processor_id())
+ goto out;
+
event = container_of(ops, struct perf_event, ftrace_ops);
/*
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-12 5:39 [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing 王贇
2021-10-12 5:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption on the testing of recursion 王贇
2021-10-12 12:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 1:46 ` 王贇
2021-10-12 12:24 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-10-12 12:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 1:52 ` 王贇
2021-10-13 1:50 ` 王贇
2021-10-13 2:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 2:36 ` 王贇
2021-10-12 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 2:04 ` 王贇
2021-10-13 2:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 2:38 ` 王贇
2021-10-12 5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: prevent preemption in perf_ftrace_function_call() 王贇
2021-10-12 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 1:45 ` 王贇
2021-10-12 5:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing 王贇
2021-10-13 3:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling 王贇
2021-10-13 3:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() 王贇
2021-10-13 3:18 ` 王贇 [this message]
2021-10-13 3:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13 3:33 ` 王贇
2021-10-26 23:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44c07848-c1e1-79f1-8356-4310c1bae037@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).