From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7508C2D0EA for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ECF20768 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726436AbgDHKXN (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 06:23:13 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:13652 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726345AbgDHKXM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 06:23:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 038A34C4061044 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 06:23:11 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3092057qcr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 06:23:11 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:22:43 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:22:39 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 038AN3cC41025560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:03 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490874204F; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F056C42049; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from JAVRIS.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.199.62.55]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:23:00 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Live patching MC at LPC2020? To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Joe Lawrence , Josh Poimboeuf , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , Nicolai Stange , Jason Baron , Gabriel Gomes , Alice Ferrazzi , Michael Matz , ulp-devel@opensuse.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org References: <20200331205204.GA7388@redhat.com> From: Kamalesh Babulal Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 15:52:59 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200331205204.GA7388@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20040810-0016-0000-0000-00000300A508 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20040810-0017-0000-0000-00003364840F Message-Id: <57a1a529-3afb-988e-f5a8-f979d8a1fe12@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-07_10:2020-04-07,2020-04-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004080084 Sender: live-patching-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org On 4/1/20 2:22 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:20:52PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> oh well, it sounds a bit awkward to be talking about any conference plans >> for this year given how the corona things are untangling in the world, but >> LPC planning committee has issued (a) statement about Covid-19 (b) call >> for papers (as originally planned) nevertheless. Please see: >> >> https://linuxplumbersconf.org/ >> https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/abstracts/ >> >> for details. >> >> Under the asumption that this Covid nuisance is over by that time and >> travel is possible (and safe) again -- do we want to eventually submit a >> livepatching miniconf proposal again? >> >> I believe there are still kernel related topics on our plate (like revised >> handling of the modules that has been agreed on in Lisbon and Petr has >> started to work on, the C parsing effort by Nicolai, etc), and at the same >> time I'd really like to include the new kids on the block too -- the >> userspace livepatching folks (CCing those I know for sure are working on >> it). >> > > Hi Jiri, > > First off, I hope everyone is riding out COVID-19 as well as possible, > considering all that's happening. > > As for LPC mini-conf topics, I'd be interested in (at least): > > - Petr's per-object livepatch POC > - klp-convert status > - objtool hacking > - Nicolai's klp-ccp status > - arch update (arm64, etc) Hi Jiri, I hope everyone is keeping safe. I would be interested in the topics listed by Joe and in userspace patching. > >> So, please if you have any opinion one way or the other, please speak up. >> Depending on the feedback, I will be fine handling the logistics of the >> miniconf submission as last year (together with Josh I guess?) unless >> someone else wants to step up and volunter himself :) >> >> (*) which is totally unclear, yes -- for example goverment in my country >> has been talking for border closure lasting for 1+ years ... but it >> all depends on how things develop of course). > > Hmm, all good points. Some conferences have gone virtual to cope with > necessary cancellations, but who knows what things will look like even > at the end of August. Perhaps we can still do something remotely if the > conditions dictate it. But my vote would be yes, and let's see what > topics interest folks. > Regards, Kamalesh