[PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[Bhaskar Chowdhury]

s/varibles/variables/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
--- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
+++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects

 Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
 variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
-require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
+require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
 these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
 shadow variables to parents already in-flight.

--
2.30.1

Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[Miroslav Benes]

Hi,

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

> 
> s/varibles/variables/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
> 
>  Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
>  variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
>  these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
>  shadow variables to parents already in-flight.

you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.

Miroslav

Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[Bhaskar Chowdhury]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
>>
>> s/varibles/variables/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
>>
>>  Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
>>  variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
>> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
>> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
>>  these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
>>  shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
>
>you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
>
Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..

So.do you have any better policy to keep track???

>Miroslav

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[Miroslav Benes]

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

> On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> s/varibles/variables/
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
> >>
> >>  Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
> >>  variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
> >> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
> >> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
> >>  these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
> >>  shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
> >
> >you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
> >
> Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
> track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..

Well, you definitely should.

> So.do you have any better policy to keep track???

I do not send a large amount of typo fixes, so it is quite easy to keep 
track of everything in my case. So please, just find something that suits 
you.

Miroslav

Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

[Jonathan Corbet]

Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes:

> On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:

>>you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
>>
> Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
> track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..
>
> So.do you have any better policy to keep track???

1) Look at the emails that maintainers like me send you when patches
are applied.

2) Work against linux-next.

jon