From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F7C433E1 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C88C207DF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725886AbgFALjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 07:39:37 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58694 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbgFALjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 07:39:37 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16313AEDE; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:39:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Miroslav Benes To: Yannick Cote cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] selftests/livepatch: more verification in test-klp-shadow-vars In-Reply-To: <20200528134849.7890-4-ycote@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20200528134849.7890-1-ycote@redhat.com> <20200528134849.7890-4-ycote@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: live-patching-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Noticed one more thing nevertheless... > + /* pass 6: free all the svar pairs too. */ > + shadow_free_all(SV_ID2, NULL); /* 'int' pairs */ > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_OBJS; i++) { > + sv = shadow_get(&objs[i], SV_ID2); > + if (!sv) > + pr_info(" shadow_get() got expected NULL result\n"); > + } I think that shadow_get() should be removed from the message to make it consistent with the rest. Miroslav