From: Alice <email@example.com>
To: Petr Mladek <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Joe Lawrence <email@example.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <email@example.com>,
Miroslav Benes <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Nicolai Stange <email@example.com>,
Jason Baron <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gabriel Gomes <email@example.com>,
Alice Ferrazzi <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Michael Matz <email@example.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Subject: Re: Live patching MC at LPC2020?
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:43:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On 6/25/20 3:59 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-03-31 16:52:04, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:20:52PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> oh well, it sounds a bit awkward to be talking about any conference plans
>>> for this year given how the corona things are untangling in the world, but
>>> LPC planning committee has issued (a) statement about Covid-19 (b) call
>>> for papers (as originally planned) nevertheless. Please see:
>>> for details.
>>> Under the asumption that this Covid nuisance is over by that time and
>>> travel is possible (and safe) again -- do we want to eventually submit a
>>> livepatching miniconf proposal again?
> The conference is going to be an online event.
>> As for LPC mini-conf topics, I'd be interested in (at least):
>> - Petr's per-object livepatch POC
>> - klp-convert status
>> - objtool hacking
>> - Nicolai's klp-ccp status
>> - arch update (arm64, etc)
>> Hmm, all good points. Some conferences have gone virtual to cope with
>> necessary cancellations, but who knows what things will look like even
>> at the end of August. Perhaps we can still do something remotely if the
>> conditions dictate it. But my vote would be yes, and let's see what
>> topics interest folks.
> It seems that there is interest into sharing/discussing some topics.
> The question is whether is has to be under the LPC even umbrella.
> Advantages of LPC:
> + well defined date
> + more attendees (ARM people, Steven Rostedt ;-)
> + access to some powerful video conference tool
> + access to another LPC content
> + support for the conference in the long term
> Advantages of self-organized event:
> + less paperwork?
> + cheaper?
> + only interested people invited
> + date after summer holidays
> + more time for the discussion
As they are both online events,
I personally have no preference on this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-27 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 13:20 Live patching MC at LPC2020? Jiri Kosina
2020-03-30 14:01 ` Michael Matz
2020-03-31 20:52 ` Joe Lawrence
2020-04-08 10:22 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2020-04-14 10:03 ` Alice ferrazzi
2020-06-25 6:59 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-27 5:43 ` Alice [this message]
2020-06-30 21:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-01 13:13 ` Michael Matz
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).