live-patching.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/stacktrace: Fix reliable check for empty user task stacks
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:04:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f136a4e5f019219cbc4f4da33b30c2f44fa65b84.1594994374.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1594994374.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

If a user task's stack is empty, or if it only has user regs, ORC
reports it as a reliable empty stack.  But arch_stack_walk_reliable()
incorrectly treats it as unreliable.

That happens because the only success path for user tasks is inside the
loop, which only iterates on non-empty stacks.  Generally, a user task
must end in a user regs frame, but an empty stack is an exception to
that rule.

Thanks to commit 71c95825289f ("x86/unwind/orc: Fix error handling in
__unwind_start()"), unwind_start() now sets state->error appropriately.
So now for both ORC and FP unwinders, unwind_done() and !unwind_error()
always means the end of the stack was successfully reached.  So the
success path for kthreads is no longer needed -- it can also be used for
empty user tasks.

Reported-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 6ad43fc44556..2fd698e28e4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
 			 * or a page fault), which can make frame pointers
 			 * unreliable.
 			 */
-
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER))
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -81,10 +80,6 @@ int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
 	if (unwind_error(&state))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* Success path for non-user tasks, i.e. kthreads and idle tasks */
-	if (!(task->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IDLE)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 14:04 [PATCH 0/2] x86/unwind: A couple of fixes for newly forked tasks Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/unwind/orc: Fix ORC " Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-17 14:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-07-20 11:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/unwind: A couple of fixes " Wangshaobo (bobo)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f136a4e5f019219cbc4f4da33b30c2f44fa65b84.1594994374.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).