* possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3)
@ 2019-12-26 21:15 syzbot
2019-12-27 3:04 ` syzbot
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2019-12-26 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adobriyan, akpm, casey, christian, kent.overstreet,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, mhocko, syzkaller-bugs, tglx
Hello,
syzbot found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 46cf053e Linux 5.5-rc3
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=114262b9e00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ed9d672709340e35
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/21257 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88804c5ad0d0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at:
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880a28aef40 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
seq_read+0x71/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:161
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #2 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:40 [inline]
__sb_start_write+0x241/0x460 fs/super.c:1674
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
mnt_want_write+0x3f/0xc0 fs/namespace.c:354
ovl_want_write+0x76/0xa0 fs/overlayfs/util.c:21
ovl_create_object+0xb3/0x2c0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:596
ovl_create+0x28/0x30 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:627
lookup_open+0x12d5/0x1a90 fs/namei.c:3241
do_last fs/namei.c:3331 [inline]
path_openat+0x14a2/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_sys_open+0x3fe/0x5d0 fs/open.c:1097
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1115 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1110 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x7e/0xc0 fs/open.c:1110
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}:
down_read+0x95/0x430 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline]
do_last fs/namei.c:3330 [inline]
path_openat+0x1e37/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_open_execat+0x137/0x690 fs/exec.c:856
__do_execve_file.isra.0+0x1702/0x22b0 fs/exec.c:1761
do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1867 [inline]
do_execve fs/exec.c:1884 [inline]
__do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1960 [inline]
__se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1955 [inline]
__x64_sys_execve+0x8f/0xc0 fs/exec.c:1955
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
do_preadv+0x1c4/0x280 fs/read_write.c:1089
__do_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1139 [inline]
__se_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1134 [inline]
__x64_sys_preadv+0x9a/0xf0 fs/read_write.c:1134
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&sig->cred_guard_mutex --> sb_writers#4 --> &p->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&p->lock);
lock(sb_writers#4);
lock(&p->lock);
lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.1/21257:
#0: ffff8880a28aef40 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 21257 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1685
check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1809
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
do_preadv+0x1c4/0x280 fs/read_write.c:1089
__do_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1139 [inline]
__se_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1134 [inline]
__x64_sys_preadv+0x9a/0xf0 fs/read_write.c:1134
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x45a919
Code: ad b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff
ff 0f 83 7b b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f76e9ff6c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000127
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 000000000045a919
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000200003c0 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000075bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f76e9ff76d4
R13: 00000000004c8cc5 R14: 00000000004e0478 R15: 00000000ffffffff
---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3)
2019-12-26 21:15 possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3) syzbot
@ 2019-12-27 3:04 ` syzbot
2019-12-27 11:55 ` syzbot
2020-04-25 14:32 ` syzbot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2019-12-27 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adobriyan, akpm, casey, christian, kent.overstreet,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, mhocko, syzkaller-bugs, tglx
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 46cf053e Linux 5.5-rc3
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13f30a3ee00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ed9d672709340e35
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176004aee00000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/9961 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888097e6bc50 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at:
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88809402fd00 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
seq_read+0x71/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:161
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #2 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:40 [inline]
__sb_start_write+0x241/0x460 fs/super.c:1674
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
mnt_want_write+0x3f/0xc0 fs/namespace.c:354
ovl_want_write+0x76/0xa0 fs/overlayfs/util.c:21
ovl_create_object+0xb3/0x2c0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:596
ovl_create+0x28/0x30 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:627
lookup_open+0x12d5/0x1a90 fs/namei.c:3241
do_last fs/namei.c:3331 [inline]
path_openat+0x14a2/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_sys_open+0x3fe/0x5d0 fs/open.c:1097
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1115 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1110 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x7e/0xc0 fs/open.c:1110
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}:
down_read+0x95/0x430 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline]
do_last fs/namei.c:3330 [inline]
path_openat+0x1e37/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_open_execat+0x137/0x690 fs/exec.c:856
__do_execve_file.isra.0+0x1702/0x22b0 fs/exec.c:1761
do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1867 [inline]
do_execve fs/exec.c:1884 [inline]
__do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1960 [inline]
__se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1955 [inline]
__x64_sys_execve+0x8f/0xc0 fs/exec.c:1955
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&sig->cred_guard_mutex --> sb_writers#4 --> &p->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&p->lock);
lock(sb_writers#4);
lock(&p->lock);
lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz-executor.4/9961:
#0: ffff888098418428 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: file_start_write
include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline]
#0: ffff888098418428 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: do_sendfile+0x9b9/0xd00
fs/read_write.c:1463
#1: ffff88809402fd00 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9961 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1685
check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1809
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x45a919
Code: ad b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff
ff 0f 83 7b b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f38e0f99c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 000000000045a919
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 000000000075c070 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000209 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f38e0f9a6d4
R13: 00000000004c925e R14: 00000000004e0f88 R15: 00000000ffffffff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3)
2019-12-26 21:15 possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3) syzbot
2019-12-27 3:04 ` syzbot
@ 2019-12-27 11:55 ` syzbot
2020-04-25 14:32 ` syzbot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2019-12-27 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adobriyan, akpm, casey, christian, kent.overstreet,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, mhocko, syzkaller-bugs, tglx
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 46cf053e Linux 5.5-rc3
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1518a6e1e00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ed9d672709340e35
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15693866e00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=12847615e00000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
overlayfs: failed to resolve './file0': -2
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor763/9723 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880a95dfed0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at:
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880a24999a0 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
seq_read+0x71/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:161
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:40 [inline]
__sb_start_write+0x241/0x460 fs/super.c:1674
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
mnt_want_write+0x3f/0xc0 fs/namespace.c:354
ovl_want_write+0x76/0xa0 fs/overlayfs/util.c:21
ovl_create_object+0xb3/0x2c0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:596
ovl_create+0x28/0x30 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:627
lookup_open+0x12d5/0x1a90 fs/namei.c:3241
do_last fs/namei.c:3331 [inline]
path_openat+0x14a2/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_sys_open+0x3fe/0x5d0 fs/open.c:1097
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1115 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1110 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x7e/0xc0 fs/open.c:1110
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}:
down_read+0x95/0x430 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline]
do_last fs/namei.c:3330 [inline]
path_openat+0x1e37/0x4500 fs/namei.c:3537
do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 fs/namei.c:3567
do_open_execat+0x137/0x690 fs/exec.c:856
__do_execve_file.isra.0+0x1702/0x22b0 fs/exec.c:1761
do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1867 [inline]
do_execve fs/exec.c:1884 [inline]
__do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1960 [inline]
__se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1955 [inline]
__x64_sys_execve+0x8f/0xc0 fs/exec.c:1955
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&sig->cred_guard_mutex --> sb_writers#3 --> &p->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&p->lock);
lock(sb_writers#3);
lock(&p->lock);
lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz-executor763/9723:
#0: ffff888098910428 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}, at: file_start_write
include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline]
#0: ffff888098910428 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}, at: do_sendfile+0x9b9/0xd00
fs/read_write.c:1463
#1: ffff8880a24999a0 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x71/0x1170
fs/seq_file.c:161
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9723 Comm: syz-executor763 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1685
check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1809
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133
do_io_accounting+0x1f4/0x820 fs/proc/base.c:2773
proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x23/0x30 fs/proc/base.c:2822
proc_single_show+0xfd/0x1c0 fs/proc/base.c:756
seq_read+0x4ca/0x1170 fs/seq_file.c:229
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x4a4/0x660 fs/read_write.c:935
vfs_readv+0xf0/0x160 fs/read_write.c:997
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline]
default_file_splice_read+0x4fb/0xa20 fs/splice.c:422
do_splice_to+0x127/0x180 fs/splice.c:892
splice_direct_to_actor+0x320/0xa30 fs/splice.c:971
do_splice_direct+0x1da/0x2a0 fs/splice.c:1080
do_sendfile+0x597/0xd00 fs/read_write.c:1464
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1dd/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1511
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x4496d9
Code: e8 9c e6 ff ff 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff
ff 0f 83 3b 05 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f91dddd5db8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006e5a18 RCX: 00000000004496d9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00000000006e5a10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000209 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000006e5a1c
R13: 00007ffc82ca42cf R14: 00007f91dddd69c0 R15: 20c49ba5e353f7cf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3)
2019-12-26 21:15 possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3) syzbot
2019-12-27 3:04 ` syzbot
2019-12-27 11:55 ` syzbot
@ 2020-04-25 14:32 ` syzbot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2020-04-25 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adobriyan, akpm, avagin, bernd.edlinger, casey, christian,
ebiederm, kent.overstreet, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, mhocko,
syzkaller-bugs, tglx
syzbot suspects this bug was fixed by commit:
commit 76518d3798855242817e8a8ed76b2d72f4415624
Author: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Date: Fri Mar 20 20:27:41 2020 +0000
proc: io_accounting: Use new infrastructure to fix deadlocks in execve
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=124347cfe00000
start commit: 46cf053e Linux 5.5-rc3
git tree: upstream
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ed9d672709340e35
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87a1b40b8fcdc9d40bd0
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15693866e00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=12847615e00000
If the result looks correct, please mark the bug fixed by replying with:
#syz fix: proc: io_accounting: Use new infrastructure to fix deadlocks in execve
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-25 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-26 21:15 possible deadlock in do_io_accounting (3) syzbot
2019-12-27 3:04 ` syzbot
2019-12-27 11:55 ` syzbot
2020-04-25 14:32 ` syzbot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).