From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD74C6FA82 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233265AbiI1JQc (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:16:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56824 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233726AbiI1JQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:16:06 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f200.google.com (mail-il1-f200.google.com [209.85.166.200]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6DD357D7 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f200.google.com with SMTP id h17-20020a056e021d9100b002f81bc83425so7981480ila.5 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:15:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=beK/RyAk6JMkokDhacR9sWsAak3KfcE5cJn8YM9YfXo=; b=jd8fzRDumobSQ5ZQ+FSjEGlaspmIIPnjtVyN7GHvqcvmXhksQio8Rg1+nhcbffd0iE 8JAY4MlBf9o1jch4gfvBDeYblCVXEM1WGeU6D+R7n5HctcH+zqVx22SrhBVHQpkWs+KH QaYNO+NoLFCca5risX91wKQ6n05YIqwB9jhElFA7CheG04goT+E0Eab1FA/qbIEOnvKX b6qRubsac3bCXxVJ2/Pb6O5w3IqnSRw5GjnGW72opUhYSvikVwlRN6MeYB+wfgq3lIJI FfQa5XA7tunDzYJvuY0VQJjUZqV7XfE/OL8WnEXFRgO9KxqVZ4vi+oLRHZ5+2HpvXVEF NUIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1UA3XL3wTCU6gVVRRk9Ufb5ADp36i6mrRa0vXH0OoBTzADxgGW Oo1TGmqYn68Fy0WcqV4ZdcPvZ4ExAjaobSN7C1LsKoEVSVkp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6BIiupKnvoAFOsnwm0XJAWBDCHCGcAp1YvPH/VWKpWZj/AjdMc8eNeAEV12usUyE8/g0EF6bCHNMAtpYRqmrNcQRRPx2su MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1074:b0:2f6:15d9:4719 with SMTP id q20-20020a056e02107400b002f615d94719mr14583204ilj.123.1664356527089; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:15:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000000000000f2b07b05d5dc87cc@google.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <00000000000093aefb05e9b93343@google.com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in fscache_free_cookie From: syzbot To: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com, linux-cachefs-owner@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mudongliangabcd@gmail.com, nogikh@google.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This bug is marked as fixed by commit: fscache: fix GPF in fscache_free_cookie But I can't find it in any tested tree for more than 90 days. Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying: #syz fix: exact-commit-title Until then the bug is still considered open and new crashes with the same signature are ignored.