linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sramana@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:09:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00043e79-3647-3979-07bb-27039921efb4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011094833.pdp4torvotvjdmkt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 10/11/2017 03:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:57:46PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>> On 09/07/2017 11:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>>> But if you invert these locks, the need for cpuset_hotplug_workfn() goes
>>> away, at least for the CPU part, and we can make in synchronous again.
>>> Yay!!
> 
>> The callback making a call to cpuset_hotplug_workfn()in hotplug path are
>>         [CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE] = {
>>                 .name                   = "sched:active",
>>                 .startup.single         = sched_cpu_activate,
>>                 .teardown.single        = sched_cpu_deactivate,
>>         },
>>
>> if we make cpuset_hotplug_workfn() synchronous, deadlock might happen:
>> _cpu_down()
>>    cpus_write_lock()  //held
>>       cpuhp_kick_ap_work()
>>         cpuhp_kick_ap()
>>            __cpuhp_kick_ap()
>>               wake_up_process() //cpuhp_thread_fun
>>                 wait_for_ap_thread() //wait for complete from cpuhp_thread_fun()
>>
>> cpuhp_thread_fun()
>>    cpuhp_invoke_callback()
>>      sched_cpu_deactivate()
>>        cpuset_cpu_inactive()
>>           cpuset_update_active_cpus()
>>              cpuset_hotplug_work()
>>                 rebuild_sched_domains()
>>                    cpus_read_lock() //waiting as acquired in _cpu_down()
> 
> Well, duh, don't use rebuild_sched_domains() 'obviously' :-) use
> rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked() instead and it works just fine.
> 
> After applying your patch, the below boots and survives a hotplug.
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/cpuset.h |    6 ------
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c |   30 +++++++++---------------------
>  kernel/power/process.c |    2 --
>  kernel/sched/core.c    |    1 -
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -51,9 +51,7 @@ static inline void cpuset_dec(void)
>  
>  extern int cpuset_init(void);
>  extern void cpuset_init_smp(void);
> -extern void cpuset_force_rebuild(void);
>  extern void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void);
> -extern void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void);
>  extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *mask);
>  extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p);
>  extern nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
> @@ -166,15 +164,11 @@ static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void)
>  static inline int cpuset_init(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline void cpuset_init_smp(void) {}
>  
> -static inline void cpuset_force_rebuild(void) { }
> -
>  static inline void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void)
>  {
>  	partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void) { }
> -
>  static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
>  				       struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -833,7 +833,12 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslo
>  	cpumask_var_t *doms;
>  	int ndoms;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * When called during hotplug, this lock is held by the calling
> +	 * thread, not cpuhp_thread_fun :/
> +	 *
>  	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> +	 */
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2281,13 +2286,6 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(
>  	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
>  }
>  
> -static bool force_rebuild;
> -
> -void cpuset_force_rebuild(void)
> -{
> -	force_rebuild = true;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * cpuset_hotplug_workfn - handle CPU/memory hotunplug for a cpuset
>   *
> @@ -2362,25 +2360,15 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct
>  	}
>  
>  	/* rebuild sched domains if cpus_allowed has changed */
> -	if (cpus_updated || force_rebuild) {
> -		force_rebuild = false;
> +	if (cpus_updated)
>  		rebuild_sched_domains();
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * We're inside cpu hotplug critical region which usually nests
> -	 * inside cgroup synchronization.  Bounce actual hotplug processing
> -	 * to a work item to avoid reverse locking order.
> -	 */
> -	schedule_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
> -}
> -
> -void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void)
> -{
> -	flush_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
> +	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +	rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked();
> +	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -203,8 +203,6 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
>  	__usermodehelper_set_disable_depth(UMH_FREEZING);
>  	thaw_workqueues();
>  
> -	cpuset_wait_for_hotplug();
> -
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>  		/* No other threads should have PF_SUSPEND_TASK set */
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5598,7 +5598,6 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
>  		 * restore the original sched domains by considering the
>  		 * cpuset configurations.
>  		 */
> -		cpuset_force_rebuild();
>  	}
>  	cpuset_update_active_cpus();
>  }
> 


Thanks Peter for sharing the patch and test results.

>  void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * We're inside cpu hotplug critical region which usually nests
> -	 * inside cgroup synchronization.  Bounce actual hotplug processing
> -	 * to a work item to avoid reverse locking order.
> -	 */
> -	schedule_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
> -}
> -
> -void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void)
> -{
> -	flush_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
> +	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +	rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked();
> +	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
>  }

In the above patch rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked() has been
used directly. Earlier cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() was also
called from cpuset_hotplug_workfn(). So migration of tasks
related to cgroup which has empty cpuset would not happen
during cpu hotplug.


Could you please help in understanding more on this.



-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 13:56 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Prateek Sood
2017-09-07 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-08  2:13   ` Prateek Sood
2017-09-07 17:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 13:27   ` Prateek Sood
2017-10-11  9:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-25  8:39       ` Prateek Sood [this message]
2017-10-25  9:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-26 11:52           ` Prateek Sood
2017-10-26 14:05             ` Waiman Long
2017-10-27  8:03               ` Prateek Sood
2017-10-30  7:16                 ` [PATCH v2] " Prateek Sood
2017-11-06  4:01                   ` Prateek Sood
2017-11-15 10:26                   ` Prateek Sood
2017-11-15 10:37                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-15 14:20                       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Invert cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex locking order Prateek Sood
2017-11-15 14:20                         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Prateek Sood
2017-11-15 14:20                         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug synchronous Prateek Sood
2017-11-27 16:48                         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Invert cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex locking order Tejun Heo
2017-11-15 17:05                       ` [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Tejun Heo
2017-11-15 17:18                         ` Prateek Sood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-07  6:04 [PATCH] " Prateek Sood
2017-09-07  7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-07  8:56   ` Boqun Feng
2017-09-07  9:07     ` Prateek Sood
2017-09-07  9:05   ` Prateek Sood
2017-09-06 11:48 Prateek Sood
2017-09-06 12:56 ` Waiman Long
2017-09-06 14:23   ` Prateek Sood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00043e79-3647-3979-07bb-27039921efb4@codeaurora.org \
    --to=prsood@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).