From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752594AbcLDHtI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2016 02:49:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:52098 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbcLDHtH (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2016 02:49:07 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 2776760385 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sricharan@codeaurora.org From: "Sricharan" To: "'Robin Murphy'" , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1480690509-13490-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH V6 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:18:56 +0530 Message-ID: <000d01d24e02$e3023700$a906a500$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQGR9okBhtJl/FFfBxUx542+deqARQGYOMjjoWtTtDA= Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Robin, >Hi Sricharan, > >On 02/12/16 14:55, Sricharan R wrote: >> This series is a resend of the V5 that Mitch sent sometime back [2] >> All the patches are the same and i have just rebased. Not sure why this >> finally did not make it last time. The last patch in the previous >> series does not apply now [3], so just redid that. Also Copied the tags >> that he had from last time as well. > >Heh, I was assuming this would be down to me to pick up. Vinod did have >some complaints last time about the commit message on the PL330 patch - >I did get as far as rewriting that and reworking onto my SMMU >changes[1], I just hadn't got round to sending it, so it fell onto the >"after the next merge window" pile. > >I'd give some review comments, but they'd essentially be a diff against >that branch :) > Sure, i did not knew that you were on this already. I can repost with the diff from your branch taken in or wait for you as well. I am fine with either ways that you suggest. I checked the patches against your branch, i see that the changes are, 1) one patch for implementing it for armv7s descriptor 2) Changes on pl330 patch commit logs and 3) One patch for doing the revert on arm-smmuv3 as well. Regards, Sricharan