From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753612AbdBPGXd (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:23:33 -0500 Received: from out0-145.mail.aliyun.com ([140.205.0.145]:36228 "EHLO out0-145.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751529AbdBPGXb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:23:31 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R251e4;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e02c03312;MF=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=8;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.7dYm3PV_1487226188; Reply-To: "Hillf Danton" From: "Hillf Danton" To: "'Mel Gorman'" , "'Andrew Morton'" Cc: "'Shantanu Goel'" , "'Chris Mason'" , "'Johannes Weiner'" , "'Vlastimil Babka'" , "'LKML'" , "'Linux-MM'" References: <20170215092247.15989-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20170215092247.15989-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20170215092247.15989-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, vmscan: Prevent kswapd sleeping prematurely due to mismatched classzone_idx Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:23:08 +0800 Message-ID: <001501d2881d$242aa790$6c7ff6b0$@alibaba-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKB+Y4QbCcdRwF90qCW6BKDtoYfwAHHz9Ymn/3UAFA= Content-Language: zh-cn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 15, 2017 5:23 PM Mel Gorman wrote: > */ > static int kswapd(void *p) > { > - unsigned int alloc_order, reclaim_order, classzone_idx; > + unsigned int alloc_order, reclaim_order; > + unsigned int classzone_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1; > pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t*)p; > struct task_struct *tsk = current; > > @@ -3447,20 +3466,23 @@ static int kswapd(void *p) > tsk->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD; > set_freezable(); > > - pgdat->kswapd_order = alloc_order = reclaim_order = 0; > - pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx = classzone_idx = 0; > + pgdat->kswapd_order = 0; > + pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES; > for ( ; ; ) { > bool ret; > > + alloc_order = reclaim_order = pgdat->kswapd_order; > + classzone_idx = kswapd_classzone_idx(pgdat, classzone_idx); > + > kswapd_try_sleep: > kswapd_try_to_sleep(pgdat, alloc_order, reclaim_order, > classzone_idx); > > /* Read the new order and classzone_idx */ > alloc_order = reclaim_order = pgdat->kswapd_order; > - classzone_idx = pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx; > + classzone_idx = kswapd_classzone_idx(pgdat, 0); > pgdat->kswapd_order = 0; > - pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx = 0; > + pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES; > > ret = try_to_freeze(); > if (kthread_should_stop()) > @@ -3486,9 +3508,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p) > reclaim_order = balance_pgdat(pgdat, alloc_order, classzone_idx); > if (reclaim_order < alloc_order) > goto kswapd_try_sleep; If we fail order-5 request, can we then give up order-5, and try order-3 if requested, after napping? > - > - alloc_order = reclaim_order = pgdat->kswapd_order; > - classzone_idx = pgdat->kswapd_classzone_idx; > } >