From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:34:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:33:57 -0400 Received: from [202.77.223.60] ([202.77.223.60]:48402 "HELO server.achan.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:33:45 -0400 Message-ID: <005c01c0c37f$0431a840$5a158640@nien.sjc.wayport.net> From: "Andrew Chan" To: "Alan Cox" Cc: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:33:04 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While you are at it, can you bug them for FastTrak (the software RAID thing) support? Their drivers are ages behind and Andre doesn't seem to be able to get them cooperate either. I have many many boards with their FastTrak chip on and I cannot use it either as FastTrak or even simple ATA100 controller. I'd happy if I can use it even as simple ATA100 controller. Andrew Chan == Alan Cox says: I've been talking constructively to promise about the i2o on the supertrak not working straight off with the kernel i2o driver. Currently it looks promising