From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:31:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:31:31 -0400 Received: from 35.roland.net ([65.112.177.35]:32780 "EHLO earth.roland.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:31:21 -0400 Message-ID: <006e01c1028e$5e1f0f70$bb1cfa18@JimWS> From: "Jim Roland" To: "Tony Hoyle" , "Paul Mundt" Cc: "Adam Schrotenboer" , "LKML" In-Reply-To: <3B3F5F5C.40907@lycosmail.com> <20010701130151.A10989@ChaoticDreams.ORG> <3B3F9CD5.60701@magenta-netlogic.com> Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU! Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 19:31:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Hoyle" To: "Paul Mundt" Cc: "Adam Schrotenboer" ; "LKML" Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 4:57 PM Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU! > Paul Mundt wrote: > > > > > You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're > > working with MS products, you were the one who made the decision to do so. > > MS is not at fault, claiming so is childish. > > Nobody chooses to work with MS, they merely take the job that's offered. > > I didn't choose to use MS, I merely chose to be able to pay the rent. > The choice is basically use MS or don't work in the computer industry. > > Hell, I'd even take a pay cut if someone had a Linux job on offer. > Never seen one... never likely to either in the near future. MS > completely owns the business world (and it's not like I've not looked > either, I'd give anything to get out of the job I'm in now but there's > very few people hiring at the moment). Actually, I work a Linux Network Manager job, and I support Solaris, Linux, and MS. MS only because some of the office folk would require more of my time if Linux is on their system (they can't deal with it). I do have the choice to put Linux on everyone's workstation and tell them that's what they must have. Don't tell me I don't have a choice. I make a lot more money because I support Linux and Unix.