From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 00:19:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 00:19:09 -0500 Received: from core.kaist.ac.kr ([143.248.147.118]:55300 "HELO core.kaist.ac.kr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 00:18:57 -0500 Message-ID: <008f01c164f1$30a06b00$9da5f88f@kaist.ac.kr> From: "Chul Lee" To: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" , Cc: "khttpd mailing list" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:26:00 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org You had better refer a paper whose tile is High-Performance Memory-Based Web Servers: Kernel and User-Space Performance, by Philippe at IBM.T.J Watson They also have experiments on performance between various kernel mode web server and user mode web server. Chul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" To: Cc: "khttpd mailing list" Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 1:21 AM Subject: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux > hi > > can someone tell me what the difference is, in functionality, speed etc. > between the tux (2.0?) webserver and khttpd? I'm working on a project > where all I need is raw speed - really raw speed - and I really don't know > which to choose. > > roy > > --- > Computers are like air conditioners. > They stop working when you open Windows. > > _______________________________________________ > khttpd-users maillist - khttpd-users@zgp.org > http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/khttpd-users