From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751655AbeAaTxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:53:18 -0500 Received: from a8-57.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.8.57]:60486 "EHLO a8-57.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbeAaTxQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:53:16 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200 To: Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Steve Presser , Hartmut Knaack , Jonathan Cameron , Jonathan Cameron , Lars Kellogg-Stedman , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mika Westerberg , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Wolfram Sang , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org References: <010001602cf53153-39ad69f1-1b39-4e6d-a748-9455a16c2fbd-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20171210182152.70ad8fbf@archlinux> <01000160dccefcb4-25edfd89-56f3-486f-88a4-cb8c07253974-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20180114104330.2aa7c1fd@archlinux> <20180128094021.572ab366@archlinux> <20180130160107.000006df@huawei.com> <9171d401-32de-b334-40da-5e80a00e24d9@redhat.com> <84f1a817-60e8-774a-3fd8-78865e53608a@redhat.com> From: Jeremy Cline Message-ID: <010001614dc7ccf4-45e85727-5a71-4cfd-a7cb-2e6b18204167-000000@email.amazonses.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:53:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <84f1a817-60e8-774a-3fd8-78865e53608a@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SES-Outgoing: 2018.01.31-54.240.8.57 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.z18Isoc/FaoPOvCyJyi1mnTt8STwoRuibXVNoUcvG6g=:AmazonSES Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/31/2018 03:58 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 31-01-18 13:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Have you chance a look at the branch I pushed yesterday? > > I assume you mean: > > https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic/iio-acpi > > This looks very nice and a much better solution then what > Jeremy Cline posted, which is my fault as I suggested that > approach to Jeremy :) Seconded, although I've already demonstrated my lack of knowledge :). Thanks for catching my error and fixing it, Andy! Regards, Jeremy