From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264863AbRFYQWp>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:22:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264864AbRFYQWf>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:22:35 -0400
Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:5388 "EHLO
	humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264863AbRFYQWZ>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:22:25 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are the VM motivations??
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:25:30 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
In-Reply-To: <20010621190103.A888@jmcmullan.resilience.com> <9h6d6b$509$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> <20010625154649.820E4784D9@mail.clouddancer.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010625154649.820E4784D9@mail.clouddancer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062518253003.01008@starship>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 25 June 2001 17:46, Colonel wrote:
> >> POST IT.  Give the rest of us some clues and the opportunity to check
> >> evaluator's replies.
> >
> >Well, if you try that strategy you'll find you never get around to posting
> > it because you'll be too worried about getting it right.  The point is
> > not to get it right, it's to get a starting point down on (virtual)
> > paper.  I'd strongly suggest passing something like that around for
> > comment privately first.
>
> Well, it does seem that some ego is involved here...

Not in this case.  Do it whichever way you want, the point is: do it (don't 
just talk about it)

--
Daniel