From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
helgehaf@idb.hist.no (Helge Hafting)
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds),
viro@math.psu.edu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:42:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0107061442040Q.03760@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15ITaa-0004Ei-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15ITaa-0004Ei-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Friday 06 July 2001 13:16, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I am convinced. I misunderstood, thinking there was a big change just
> > for
> > ACPI which I and many others don't use. Thanks for clearing things up.
>
> It solves a few long standing arguments too - we can slap .config in it
> ending the long standing /proc/config argument without using any ram except
> when people care
The same for System.map
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-06 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-04 10:37 [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems Dave J Woolley
2001-07-04 11:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-04 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-05 8:20 ` Helge Hafting
2001-07-05 8:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-05 11:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-05 13:42 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-05 15:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-06 7:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-06 8:45 ` Helge Hafting
2001-07-06 11:16 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-06 12:42 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-07-09 23:05 ` Pavel Machek
2001-07-07 10:32 ` Eugene Crosser
2001-07-07 11:32 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-07 13:37 ` Eugene Crosser
2001-07-07 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-07 17:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-07 21:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-07-08 7:26 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-08 16:46 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-09 14:40 ` Anthony DeBoer
2001-07-07 21:44 ` Steve VanDevender
2001-07-07 11:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-07 21:40 ` Mike Touloumtzis
2001-07-07 21:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-07-07 22:00 ` arjan
2001-07-07 22:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-07-07 22:04 ` Mike Touloumtzis
2001-07-07 22:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-07-08 2:57 ` Keith Owens
2001-07-12 15:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-12 16:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-12 21:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-06 5:26 Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0107061442040Q.03760@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=helgehaf@idb.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).