From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965360Ab3HHOKe (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:10:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:52942 "EHLO mail-pb0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757880Ab3HHNta (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:49:30 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 05/35] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:18:07 +0530 Message-Id: <01b9e673a0f3791720ef0f0b66d6ffc2dd331219.1375964117.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 9b5d1b1..75e829d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) data->freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; perf->state = 0; - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, data->freq_table); + result = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, data->freq_table); if (result) goto err_freqfree; @@ -868,8 +868,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) (u32) perf->states[i].power, (u32) perf->states[i].transition_latency); - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(data->freq_table, policy->cpu); - /* * the first call to ->target() should result in us actually * writing something to the appropriate registers. -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e