Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: qcom : dispcc: Add support for display port clocks

[Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for your comments.

On 7/16/2019 4:07 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2019-05-14 21:20:39)
>> @@ -128,6 +144,82 @@ enum {
>>          },
>>   };
>>
>> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src[] = {
>> +       F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0),
>> +       { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src = {
>> +       .cmd_rcgr = 0x219c,
>> +       .mnd_width = 0,
>> +       .hid_width = 5,
>> +       .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_2,
>> +       .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src,
>> +       .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> +               .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src",
>> +               .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_2,
>> +               .num_parents = 2,
>> +               .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> +               .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> +       },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src = {
>> +       .cmd_rcgr = 0x2154,
>> +       .mnd_width = 0,
>> +       .hid_width = 5,
>> +       .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_1,
>> +       .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> +               .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src",
>> +               .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_1,
>> +               .num_parents = 4,
>> +               .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
> 
> Why do we need this flag on various clks here? I'd prefer this is
> removed. If it can't be removed, we need to describe in a code comment
> why this must be set.
> 
> If it's some sort of problem where the upstream PLL goes into bypass
> across a reset, then we probably need to change the display code to
> restore that rate across a reset by calling clk_set_rate() on the PLL
> directly. And we might need to think about how to inform the framework
> that this has happened, so that downstream clks can be notified of the
> change in frequency.
> 

I had another discussion with the team and they are okay to remove these 
flags, so would submit the next patch with the flag removed.

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--