linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net>
To: "'Helge Hafting'" <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
	"'Jesse Pollard'" <jesse@cats-chateau.net>
Cc: "'Fredrik Tolf'" <fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PTY DOS vulnerability?
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:42:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <028001c34065$15777250$4100a8c0@witbe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030701195323.GA15483@hh.idb.hist.no>

Hello,

> > second, just providing a user limit doesn't prevent a denial of 
> > service.. Just have more connections than ptys and you are 
> in the same 
> > situation.
> 
> Isn't this something a improved sshd could do?  I.e. if the 
> connection using up the last (or one of the last) pty's logs 
> in as non-root - just kill it.

Why restricting this to SSH ? I mean, this can occur even if you
are not using SSH.

Some per-user limit seems to be good... but if we do that, what about
also limiting the number of TCP/UDP ports used on a per-user basis ?

In fact, all the resources that are available should be per-user limited
if you want to avoid a single one causing a complete DoS...
 - CPU
 - Memory
 - Network
 - Disk
 - Pty
 - ...

Paul


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-02  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-30 14:18 PTY DOS vulnerability? Fredrik Tolf
2003-06-30 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-30 21:31   ` Fredrik Tolf
2003-06-30 21:36     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-01 12:15       ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-01 13:41       ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-01  6:22 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-01 11:57 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-01 19:53   ` Helge Hafting
2003-07-02  6:42     ` Paul Rolland [this message]
2003-07-03  1:14     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-03  1:52       ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-08 23:11 Clayton Weaver
2003-07-09 10:08 ` Svein Ove Aas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='028001c34065$15777250$4100a8c0@witbe' \
    --to=rol@as2917.net \
    --cc=fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=jesse@cats-chateau.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).