linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Create and use a TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING macro
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:05:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02bf2f54b8dcb76a62a142b6dfe07d4ef7fc582e.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net>

x86_32, unlike x86_64, pads the top of the kernel stack.  Document
this padding and give it a name.

This should make no change whatsoever to the compiled kernel image.
It also doesn't fix any of the current bugs in this area.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h   |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 48a61c1c626e..88d9aa745898 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -849,7 +849,8 @@ extern unsigned long thread_saved_pc(struct task_struct *tsk);
 #define task_pt_regs(task)                                             \
 ({                                                                     \
        struct pt_regs *__regs__;                                       \
-       __regs__ = (struct pt_regs *)(KSTK_TOP(task_stack_page(task))-8); \
+       __regs__ = (struct pt_regs *)(KSTK_TOP(task_stack_page(task)) - \
+				     TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING);     \
        __regs__ - 1;                                                   \
 })
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 7740edd56fed..74fd74ca50d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -49,6 +49,36 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define init_thread_info	(init_thread_union.thread_info)
 #define init_stack		(init_thread_union.stack)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+
+/*
+ * TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING is a number of unused bytes that we
+ * reserve at the top of the kernel stack.  We do it because of a nasty
+ * 32-bit corner case.  On x86_32, the hardware stack frame is
+ * variable-length.  Except for vm86 mode, struct pt_regs assumes a
+ * maximum-length frame.  If we enter from CPL 0, the top 8 bytes of
+ * pt_regs don't actually exist.  Ordinarily this doesn't matter, but it
+ * does in at least one case:
+ *
+ * If we take an NMI early enough in sysenter, the we can end up with
+ * pt_regs that extends above sp0.  On the way out, in the espfix code,
+ * we can read the saved SS value, but that value will be above sp0.
+ * Without this offset, that can result in a page fault.  (We are
+ * careful that, in this case, the value we read doesn't matter.)
+ *
+ * In vm86 mode, the hardware frame is much longer still, but we neither
+ * access the extra members from NMI context, nor do we write such a
+ * frame at sp0 at all.
+ */
+#define TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING 8
+
+#else
+
+/* Phew, x86_64 has a fixed-length stack frame! */
+#define TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING 0
+
+#endif
+
 #else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
-- 
2.3.0


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-10 18:05 [PATCH 0/3] sp0, ss1, and sp1 docs and minor fixes Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 18:05 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2015-03-10 19:22   ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: Create and use a TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING macro Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-10 19:47     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-13 14:08     ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-16  8:56   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-16 12:08   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Create and use a ' TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING' macro tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17  8:45   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: Unify and fix init sp0 Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-11 11:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-16 12:09   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Unify and fix initial thread_struct: :sp0 values tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17  8:45   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86_32: Document our abuse of ss1 and sp1 Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 19:13   ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-10 20:06     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10 20:52       ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-16 12:09   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/32: Document our abuse of x86_hw_tss: :ss1 and x86_hw_tss::sp1 tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-16 15:36     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17  8:45   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02bf2f54b8dcb76a62a142b6dfe07d4ef7fc582e.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net \
    --to=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).