From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:37:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:37:35 -0500 Received: from shell.ca.us.webchat.org ([216.152.64.152]:57530 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:37:29 -0500 Message-ID: <030d01c09f8c$e01b57a0$7c4cf9d1@geeksparadise.com> Reply-To: "davids" From: "davids" To: "Adam Fritzler" , In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Core dumps for threads Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:36:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It does work, however. It effectively dumps the thread that caused the > fault. If you want that behavior, catch SIGSEGV, fork, and have the child process (in which only the faulting thread exists) call abort. DS