From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S938857AbcIWKVI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 23 Sep 2016 06:21:08 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:55037 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S938550AbcIWKVG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 23 Sep 2016 06:21:06 -0400
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <4d34446f-05ad-c3ce-5d33-8fb4f25af25c@users.sourceforge.net>
 <f079ffc1-042c-0332-98e1-5acc6589e4b6@vodafone.de>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <05418fb1-ad66-aba3-bd8c-f6b684a83279@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:20:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f079ffc1-042c-0332-98e1-5acc6589e4b6@vodafone.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:V7/5CSnjzTA2yUDlBBAN4etWY2FCCdBDzWU/P90MEMSFrO5SV9y
 D8zSe2rEn3DogQnxEdWgAibYv0+C6lSzbTBhFvxx9qjRsSJkTY1D903n/jcf1/0sGGEmd4l
 U4jGq2rpB067adZAt89tEekTaS2zBnh9bsNbtNmi408byMhkxpteSgJWB0isk6OZN++3Oj+
 tUFpv1rG2pMI3/GC+MHtQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:aBjIyonKI0I=:n98Dfaz9wPpBk+bcFXSwaV
 Qk0yv1K6OxcnNXijtd+GFcngfgRbmHR0lXbNwbTuVcQ7WbT8r+rbKRsjzfcM9M0phwbqMZtbO
 qz605DVWdsV9CwL5zC/o9qauFJR4ghY8Mn6a12aXa9WStA0MK31gyZkp7Ke4tLNshlh4KTWsy
 8D3tNebNpVBCxVFa19219di1/PiBp+T393GSrzeRlrxq/FMm3AHgkTwih8s0aMWlthUdMhV9Y
 jLAO6HvmylOJDXUY0t80VEv487Cacim8qhFjaKIUVEdiImxE3BFbDNQFQMx7XJv1A7zdw9nW1
 tmj7UkdjmN/f/GhKM4NxWYifZaj2VdQfH8LWMgOit2BjFkGDxgV8npNnzx42+8QpEsGE2YfT9
 ZdikHIYpE8JDg1xlTmiEeAwI7KZPZDnkHu4DJ5EbpMQq7qBx30dVZAEd3owAV/yqmsXu4+4g4
 ocye5dHGsaeZBT6+hBf8rUkTUMPojjbac8Hc86gf1Ztb0IvoC7Ijl+EvKB0ZkMh/aCSs94rb/
 HZUifnpIxwM0AQl/W0on/xK/33Fh5UpK+1K5PShzrB77MLEzP2FwZlLYQgbOajQF+eCOwQaNk
 vumzIPVVWCks1/NI6lsB3eFt0CnG2Ugc8RsMg19XNTw1STybL6lQqeAo4M+oqFY2upXm37DhZ
 cWSnvPhMx9vqL3HzOHXwQYltsIHaAy+e6Ca6PWlWxhnBqYF1zPDwD3meRxvYhFRIcLwCoIgZC
 ndq9j4fvxe1ODaQD5NWQ24TR8UV1/1ET2OkDYMkRDJmG7gMCnrKpZBIOfAgc8EYe6YfHSl2il
 1spEj6J
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Additional to that I don't really see the point in renaming some of the jump labels,

I am suggesting changes for another collateral software evolution.


> if you call it "restart" or "lock_restart" doesn't make much difference.

Do other identifiers fit better to a specification from the document "CodingStyle"
like the following?

"…
Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists.
…"


Does this wording need any more adjustments?

Regards,
Markus