From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793ECC432BE for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA646113C for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241111AbhHEUjd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:39:33 -0400 Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]:52145 "EHLO gecko.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241038AbhHEUjb (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:39:31 -0400 Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 175Kd4IU003303 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:39:04 +0200 Received: from [139.22.32.15] ([139.22.32.15]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 175Kd3qS026651; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:39:03 +0200 To: M Chetan Kumar Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Netdev List , linuxwwan@intel.com From: Jan Kiszka Subject: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360 Message-ID: <0545a78f-63f0-f8dd-abdb-1887c65e1c79@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:39:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chetan, at the risk of having missed this being answered already: How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline? There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that hardware or its firmware too different? Thanks, Jan [1] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux