From: Iouri Tarassov <iourit@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iourit@microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: hv: dxgkrnl: core code
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:25:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <054abab3-748e-c56b-526a-1b1734a9eaf7@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821135340.GA4067@bug>
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for your time reviewing the driver.
On 8/21/2020 6:53 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2020-08-14 08:38:53, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Add support for a Hyper-V based vGPU implementation that exposes the
> > DirectX API to Linux userspace.
>
> NAK.
>
> Kernel APIs should be documented. ... in tree and with suitable license.
We are considering to add required documentation. The design is that the
driver IOCTLs will not be called directly by user mode drivers or
applications. They will instead link with libdxcore.so and use the
D3DKMT* interface to send requests to the driver. libdxcore will
translate the request to driver IOCTLs and do some additional work. For
example, it will translate the path of the user mode driver name to the
Linux namespace. The D3DKMTinterface is documented on MSDN. Do you
suggest that the IOCTL interface needs to be documented or the D3DKMT
interface?
>
> > +int dxgadapter_init(struct dxgadapter *adapter, struct hv_device *hdev)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + char s[80];
> > +
> > + UNUSED(s);
>
> What is going on here?
This is a mistake, which will be fixed.
>
> > +{
> > + struct dxgprocess_adapter *adapter_info = dxgmem_alloc(process,
> > + DXGMEM_PROCESS_ADAPTER,
> > + sizeof
> > + (*adapter_info));
>
> We normally use kernel functions in kernel code.
Using a custom memory allocation function allows us to track memory
allocations per DXGPROCESS and catch memory leaks when a DXGPROCESS is
destroyed or when the driver is unloaded. It also allows to easily
change the memory allocation implementation if needed.
>
> > + dxgmutex_unlock(&device->adapter_info->device_list_mutex);
>
> And you should not have private locking primitives, either.
This is done to allow the implementation of custom lock order
verification. We learnt recently about lock dependency checking in
kernel and will evaluate if it can replace the custom lock order
verification.
>
> > +bool dxghwqueue_acquire_reference(struct dxghwqueue *hwqueue)
> > +{
> > + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&hwqueue->refcount);
> > +}
>
> Midlayers are evil.
I strongly agree in general, but think that in our case the layers are
very small. It allows to quickly find all places where a
reference/dereference on an object is done and addition of debug tracing
to catch errors.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
Thank you
Iouri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-28 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 12:38 [PATCH 0/4] drivers: hv: Microsoft Virtual GPU Driver Sasha Levin
2020-08-14 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] drivers: hv: dxgkrnl: core code Sasha Levin
2020-08-14 12:55 ` Greg KH
2020-08-27 23:29 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-28 6:01 ` Greg KH
2020-08-14 12:57 ` Greg KH
2020-08-27 23:45 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-28 6:15 ` Greg KH
2020-08-14 13:04 ` Greg KH
2020-08-28 0:05 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-28 6:12 ` Greg KH
2020-09-03 18:55 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-09-03 19:32 ` Greg KH
2020-08-14 13:18 ` Wei Liu
2020-08-26 20:20 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-27 0:12 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-27 19:09 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-08-21 13:53 ` Pavel Machek
2020-08-28 0:25 ` Iouri Tarassov [this message]
2020-08-28 6:17 ` Greg KH
2020-08-28 6:18 ` Greg KH
2020-09-03 21:39 ` Iouri Tarassov
2020-09-04 5:18 ` Greg KH
2020-08-14 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] drivers: hv: dxgkrnl: hook up dxgkrnl Sasha Levin
2020-08-14 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] drivers: hv: vmbus: " Sasha Levin
2020-08-14 12:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: hv: dxgkrnl: create a MAINTAINERS entry Sasha Levin
2020-08-14 13:04 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=054abab3-748e-c56b-526a-1b1734a9eaf7@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=iourit@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=iourit@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).