From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: whiteheadm@acm.org, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Allocation failure with subsequent kernel crash
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05825446-e8aa-a983-3fc6-4dc8e81cba57@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8WD_ba1k6uxSFQ00QtW0L23jzjSFw93YpEq+010zKE5sT27g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matthew,
On 08/20/2018 08:03 AM, tedheadster wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't remember vzalloc issues that was fixed in this area.
>> 4.14 kernel is quite old. Since then syzbot found few mem
>> related bugs that were fixed.
>> please try to reproduce on the latest tree.
>
> Alexei,
> I get this panic with two very recent kernels: 4.18.0 and 4.17.14. I
> do not think this has been fixed. I am still trying to bisect it, but
> sometimes it takes 5 hours for the panic to occur.
I've been looking into it a bit today and still am. Given you've seen
this on x86_32 and also on older kernels, I presume JIT was not involved
(/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable is 0). Do you run any specific workload
until you trigger this (e.g. fuzzer on BPF), or any specific event that
triggers at that time after ~5hrs? Or only systemd on idle machine? Have
you managed to reproduce this also elsewhere? Bisect seems indeed painful
but would help tremendously; perhaps also dumping the BPF insns that are
loaded at that point in time.
Thanks a lot,
Daniel
> - Matthew Whitehead
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-20 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 17:17 Allocation failure with subsequent kernel crash tedheadster
2018-08-20 5:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-08-20 6:03 ` tedheadster
2018-08-20 19:29 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-09-05 14:39 ` tedheadster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05825446-e8aa-a983-3fc6-4dc8e81cba57@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=whiteheadm@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).