From: "Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
To: "Ilya Maximets" <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xdp: fix potential deadlock on socket mutex
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 07:21:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0617EEA7-7883-4800-B1E2-5D59D8120C67@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708110344.23278-1-i.maximets@samsung.com>
On 8 Jul 2019, at 4:03, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> There are 2 call chains:
>
> a) xsk_bind --> xdp_umem_assign_dev
> b) unregister_netdevice_queue --> xsk_notifier
>
> with the following locking order:
>
> a) xs->mutex --> rtnl_lock
> b) rtnl_lock --> xdp.lock --> xs->mutex
>
> Different order of taking 'xs->mutex' and 'rtnl_lock' could produce a
> deadlock here. Fix that by moving the 'rtnl_lock' before 'xs->lock' in
> the bind call chain (a).
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+bf64ec93de836d7f4c2c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 455302d1c9ae ("xdp: fix hang while unregistering device bound
> to xdp socket")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Thanks, Ilya!
I think in the long run the locking needs to be revisited,
but this should fix the deadlock for now.
Acked-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
> This patch is a fix for patch that is not yet in mainline, but
> already in 'net' tree. I'm not sure what is the correct process
> for applying such fixes.
>
> net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 16 ++++++----------
> net/xdp/xsk.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index 20c91f02d3d8..83de74ca729a 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -87,21 +87,20 @@ int xdp_umem_assign_dev(struct xdp_umem *umem,
> struct net_device *dev,
> struct netdev_bpf bpf;
> int err = 0;
>
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> force_zc = flags & XDP_ZEROCOPY;
> force_copy = flags & XDP_COPY;
>
> if (force_zc && force_copy)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - rtnl_lock();
> - if (xdp_get_umem_from_qid(dev, queue_id)) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out_rtnl_unlock;
> - }
> + if (xdp_get_umem_from_qid(dev, queue_id))
> + return -EBUSY;
>
> err = xdp_reg_umem_at_qid(dev, umem, queue_id);
> if (err)
> - goto out_rtnl_unlock;
> + return err;
>
> umem->dev = dev;
> umem->queue_id = queue_id;
> @@ -110,7 +109,7 @@ int xdp_umem_assign_dev(struct xdp_umem *umem,
> struct net_device *dev,
>
> if (force_copy)
> /* For copy-mode, we are done. */
> - goto out_rtnl_unlock;
> + return 0;
>
> if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf ||
> !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_async_xmit) {
> @@ -125,7 +124,6 @@ int xdp_umem_assign_dev(struct xdp_umem *umem,
> struct net_device *dev,
> err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf(dev, &bpf);
> if (err)
> goto err_unreg_umem;
> - rtnl_unlock();
>
> umem->zc = true;
> return 0;
> @@ -135,8 +133,6 @@ int xdp_umem_assign_dev(struct xdp_umem *umem,
> struct net_device *dev,
> err = 0; /* fallback to copy mode */
> if (err)
> xdp_clear_umem_at_qid(dev, queue_id);
> -out_rtnl_unlock:
> - rtnl_unlock();
> return err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 703cf5ea448b..2aa6072a3e55 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct
> sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
> if (flags & ~(XDP_SHARED_UMEM | XDP_COPY | XDP_ZEROCOPY))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + rtnl_lock();
> mutex_lock(&xs->mutex);
> if (xs->state != XSK_READY) {
> err = -EBUSY;
> @@ -501,6 +502,7 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct
> sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
> xs->state = XSK_BOUND;
> out_release:
> mutex_unlock(&xs->mutex);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> return err;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190708110350eucas1p16357da1f812ff8309b1edc98d4cdacc1@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 11:03 ` [PATCH bpf] xdp: fix potential deadlock on socket mutex Ilya Maximets
2019-07-08 14:21 ` Jonathan Lemon [this message]
2019-07-12 13:07 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0617EEA7-7883-4800-B1E2-5D59D8120C67@gmail.com \
--to=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).