From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB63C43603 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C99206D8 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:28:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576502907; bh=en62J9Sle+YYjeP96DqQn4yayB6lPx6YOVyC3LY1Kis=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wqV9RYp5e8+NO050sYfSPnR00Ls/XjJO3mLWfDOyIyjiVGksO3LNwqcwjwk/ej79S /Qc5vKlUP/XG7arF6M9iWEi7rGOiECLarz+7CDDlnlpjVQNva6z/IUckOzBDLGu6sA W89dEB7/Fb4iGdUYc1ZcLoyxB/D/DDAUZ83GUkWA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727935AbfLPN20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 08:28:26 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727601AbfLPN20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 08:28:26 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.114] (unknown [58.212.132.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC3C0206CB; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:28:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576502905; bh=en62J9Sle+YYjeP96DqQn4yayB6lPx6YOVyC3LY1Kis=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dbGzyJj4vH71sNkYyLTdAqtPy1ugCsqngU/6RSks1Og8gfuhSodwPMPwzEwhunxwl FIlvIXutM7Pca1Vn7QSzPyR3RrEXn4vBEOCBraj/GbxH2hjDROvOF6VqDVuFDoChqQ E4YdEa6hbIMxg6jYKvelWonDkjDPiL7aL4CVpALc= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5] f2fs: support data compression To: Markus Elfring , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20191216062806.112361-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <0ab8c593-d043-cdf6-7805-f7bceba8e519@web.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <0677a4fd-62a5-ad98-fd02-ae7d5a9cb501@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:28:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0ab8c593-d043-cdf6-7805-f7bceba8e519@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-12-16 19:51, Markus Elfring wrote: > … >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > … >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION >> +bool f2fs_is_compressed_page(struct page *page); > … > > Can the following adjustment make sense? > > +bool f2fs_is_compressed_page(const struct page *page); > > > Would you like to improve const-correctness at any more source code places? I can't figure out a good reason to do that for f2fs internal functions... Thanks, > > Regards, > Markus >