linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	jolsa@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf util: Use target->per_thread and target->system_wide flags
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 07:02:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06929c28-6431-29f2-340e-6dbc2302c78b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkwdHYMoHz8sbnKOOmGmE3CkZD1SRmDbnjJ0CbdoL7mdHw@mail.gmail.com>



On 1/23/2018 5:10 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 15:15, Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Mathieu Poirier reports issue in commit ("73c0ca1eee3d perf thread_map:
>> Enumerate all threads from /proc") that it has negative impact on
>> 'perf record --per-thread'. It has the effect of creating a kernel event
>> for each thread in the system for 'perf record --per-thread'.
>>
>> Mathieu Poirier's patch ("perf util: Do not reuse target->per_thread flag")
>> can fix this issue by creating a new target->all_threads flag.
>>
>> This patch is based on Mathieu Poirier's patch but it doesn't use a new
>> target->all_threads flag. This patch just uses 'target->per_thread &&
>> target->system_wide' as a condition to check for all threads case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/util/evlist.c     | 2 +-
>>   tools/perf/util/thread_map.c | 4 ++--
>>   tools/perf/util/thread_map.h | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>> index 120efd8..9dff74a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ int perf_evlist__create_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct target *target)
>>          struct thread_map *threads;
>>
>>          threads = thread_map__new_str(target->pid, target->tid, target->uid,
>> -                                     target->per_thread);
>> +                                     target->per_thread && target->system_wide);
> 
> At first glance I thought your solution would do the trick but perf
> record does use target->system_wide when the '-a' switch is used.
> Moreover specifying the '-a' switch doesn't prevent the '--per-thread'
> option from being used as well, making both target->perf_thread and
> target_system_wide equal to true (and that is not good).
> 
> Although not a fan of adding more to struct target, the advantage of
> having target->all_threads is that we are guaranteed that it isn't
> used anywhere else.
> 
> Let me know what you think,
> Mathieu
> 

If we specify both '-a' and '--per-thread' to perf record, perf record 
will override'--per-thread'. So now target->per_thread = false, and 
target->system_wide = true.

If we specify '--per-thread' only to perf record, target->per_thread = 
true, and target->system_wide = false.

So whatever for any case, target->per_thread && target->system_wide is 
false.

Since the parameter is false, in thread_map__new_str(), it will not 
execute the thread_map__new_all_cpus(). So that will not change perf 
record previous behavior.

In perf stat, it allows the case that target->per_thread and 
target->system_wide are all true. That means we want to collect 
system-wide per-thread metrics.

That's my current thinking.

Thanks
Jin Yao

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-22 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-22 22:15 [PATCH] perf util: Use target->per_thread and target->system_wide flags Jin Yao
2018-01-22 21:10 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-22 23:02   ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2018-01-22 23:55     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-23 14:40     ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-24  0:12       ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-22 23:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-23  1:08   ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06929c28-6431-29f2-340e-6dbc2302c78b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).