From: <Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>
To: <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: <wsa@kernel.org>, <sboyd@kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<a.zummo@towertech.it>, <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<o.rempel@pengutronix.de>, <Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
<aardelean@deviqon.com>, <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<lee.jones@linaro.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:18:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06e799be-b7c0-5b93-8586-678a449d2239@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723091331.wl33wtcvvnejuhau@pengutronix.de>
On 23.07.2021 12:13, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>
> ForwardedMessage.eml
>
> Subject:
> Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks
> enabled clocks
> From:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Date:
> 23.07.2021, 12:13
>
> To:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> CC:
> Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
> "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
> "linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea
> <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
> Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Nicolas Ferre
> <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org"
> <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
> Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, Mark Brown
> <broonie@kernel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, Alexandru
> Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>, "kernel@pengutronix.de"
> <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Lee Jones
> <lee.jones@linaro.org>, "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org"
> <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
> <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> [adding Linus and lkml to Cc: and adding some more context]
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:21:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> given that I don't succeed in getting any feedback for my patch set, I'm
>> trying with a pull request today.
> This is for a series that is currently in v7 and didn't get any feedback
> at all yet. The history is:
>
> v1: 2020-10-13, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20201013082132.661993-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> no feedback at all
>
> v2: 2021-03-01, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210301110821.1445756-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
> kernel test robot identified some issues
>
> v3: 2021-03-01, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210301135053.1462168-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> I added a few driver patches to show the benefit. (However in a way
> that the autobuilders don't understand, so there were some false
> positive build failure reports.)
>
> v4: 2021-03-30, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210330181755.204339-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> Got some feedback for the converted drivers by the respective
> maintainers. Some were indifferent, some found it good
>
> v5: 2021-04-22, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210422065726.1646742-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> Fixed a problem in one of the driver changes (i2c-imx), no feedback
> apart from pointing out a few typos, silence from the clk
> maintainers
>
> v6: 2021-04-26, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210426141730.2826832-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> Just the typos fixed, no feedback
>
> v6 resend: 2021-05-10, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210510061724.940447-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> no changes in code. Got some feedback from Jonathan Cameron
>
> v7: 2021-05-10, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210510174142.986250-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> Adress Jonathan's feedback, recieved some more acks from non-clk
> people
>
> pull request: 2021-07-09, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210609202123.u5rmw7al4x3rrvun@pengutronix.de
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:26:58AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 22, 2021, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>> What about adding gkh to the list explaining the situation to him?
>>>> Greg doesn't like devm_ stuff.
>>>>
>>>> I already asked Arnd who doesn't want to interfere and akpm who didn't
>>>> react either up to now.
>>> Wow, okay, that is frustrating.
>> The situation simply shows the process gap and One Maintainer nowadays is
>> far from enough to satisfy demands.
> Technically there are two maintainers for drivers/clk, Michael Turquette
> and Stephen Boyd. It seems Michael is MIA and Stephen doesn't have the
> capacity to address all requests.
>
>> What I think about is that we need to escalate this to Linus and
>> others and elaborate the mechanisms how to squeeze a new (additional)
>> maintainer when the original one is not responsive. Let’s say some
>> procedural steps. Otherwise we doomed because of human factor.
> Assuming there was some process for this, is there someone who is
> willing to take responsibility here?
Hi,
In the last year I worked on AT91 clock drivers and I would be available
for taking responsibility beyond AT91 clocks (if everyone's OK with this),
in whatever form the current maintainers and people in the audience would
agree, if any (co-maintainer or other forms that could be useful). The idea
is to help things progress as I also have patches waiting for feedback on
clock mailing list for almost 6 months.
Let me know if I can be helpful.
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions |
> https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210510174142.986250-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20210609202123.u5rmw7al4x3rrvun@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20210625171434.3xusxpxjprcdqa47@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20210705080144.zfbzkm7l3gmnh6st@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20210722060654.nudpdtemosi64nlb@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <YPkg0wtYIoHKpTUW@kunai>
[not found] ` <20210722081817.2tsjzof4gvldq6ka@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <YPlfcbkxiBmB+vw1@kunai>
[not found] ` <CAHp75VfC=s12Unw3+Cn0ag71mM5i90=Jbwj4nYwB5cPKiUTRSA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-23 9:13 ` [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-26 9:18 ` Claudiu.Beznea [this message]
2021-07-26 9:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-26 12:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-07-26 13:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-26 17:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-07-28 20:25 ` About clk maintainership [Was: Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks] Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-28 20:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-31 7:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-31 8:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-31 12:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-08-02 9:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-08-02 9:48 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-08-02 15:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-08-02 16:38 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-08-02 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-02 20:28 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-08-03 8:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-03 10:40 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-08-06 0:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-14 13:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-09-14 13:52 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-03 7:44 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06e799be-b7c0-5b93-8586-678a449d2239@microchip.com \
--to=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=aardelean@deviqon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).