From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Matt Rickard <matt@softrans.com.au>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:08:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06e91c26-756f-f236-0af2-327e520c3065@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809190037570.1468@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 2018-09-19 00:46, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Do we do better if we use signed arithmetic for the whole calculation?
>> Then a small backwards movement would result in a small backwards result.
>> Or we could offset everything so that we’d have to go back several
>> hundred ms before we cross zero.
>
> That would be probably the better solution as signed math would be
> problematic when the resulting ns value becomes negative. As the delta is
> really small, otherwise the TSC sync check would have caught it, the caller
> should never be able to observe time going backwards.
>
> I'll have a look into that. It needs some thought vs. the fractional part
> of the base time, but it should be not rocket science to get that
> correct. Famous last words...
Does the sentinel need to be U64_MAX? What if vgetcyc and its minions
returned gtod->cycle_last-1 (for some value of 1), and the caller just
does "if ((s64)cycles - (s64)last < 0) return fallback; ns +=
(cycles-last)* ...". That should just be a "sub ; js ; ". It's an extra
load of ->cycle_last, but only on the path where we're heading for the
fallback anyway. The value of 1 can be adjusted so that in the "js"
path, we could detect and accept an rdtsc_ordered() call that's just a
few 10s of cycles behind last and treat that as 0 and continue back on
the normal path. But maybe it's hard to get gcc to generate the expected
code.
Rasmus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-14 12:50 [patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 01/11] clocksource: Provide clocksource_arch_init() Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 02/11] x86/time: Implement clocksource_arch_init() Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 15:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-15 6:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 03/11] x86/vdso: Enforce 64bit clocksource Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 04/11] x86/vdso: Use unsigned int consistently for vsyscall_gtod_data::seq Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 05/11] x86/vdso: Introduce and use vgtod_ts Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 06/11] x86/vdso: Collapse high resolution functions Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 07/11] x86/vdso: Collapse coarse functions Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 08/11] x86/vdso: Replace the clockid switch case Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-17 19:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-17 20:12 ` John Stultz
2018-09-18 7:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-18 8:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 10:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 10:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-18 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-18 15:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 14:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-18 22:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 23:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-18 23:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 14:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 14:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-19 9:08 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2018-09-19 13:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 10/11] x86/vdso: Move cycle_last handling into the caller Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 15:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-14 12:50 ` [patch 11/11] x66/vdso: Add CLOCK_TAI support Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 14:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-14 14:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 14:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-16 9:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 12:56 ` [patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and " Florian Weimer
2018-09-14 13:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 13:06 ` Florian Weimer
2018-09-14 13:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-14 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-14 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-17 13:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-24 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-03 5:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-03 9:22 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-03 10:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-03 12:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-03 14:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-03 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03 16:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-03 19:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-04 7:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-04 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-04 14:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-04 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-04 20:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-04 22:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-06 20:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-06 22:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 15:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-08 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 19:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-09 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-11 22:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-11 23:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-15 13:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-06 20:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-04 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-04 14:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-05 21:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-03 19:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-03 19:05 ` [patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support\ Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-03 22:32 ` [patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-04 16:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2018-10-04 17:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-04 17:28 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-04 20:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06e91c26-756f-f236-0af2-327e520c3065@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@softrans.com.au \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).