From: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bvanassche@acm.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mwilck@suse.com,
yuyufen@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: disk revalidation updates and OOM
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:00:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <071c4f38-df7b-b094-1bd0-436fcdb05767@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200307142950.GA26325@lst.de>
On 3/7/20 10:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So I looked into this, and if it was just the uevent this
> should have been fixed in:
>
> "block: don't send uevent for empty disk when not invalidating"
>
> from Eric Biggers in December. Does the problem still occur with that
> patch applied?
Yes, it occurs with that patch. The patch that introduces the issue and the one
you mentioned above both went in in v5.5-rc1. I found this issue in v5.5
release.
Thanks,
Zhe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-08 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 3:55 disk revalidation updates and OOM He Zhe
2020-03-04 13:37 ` Jan Kara
2020-03-04 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-07 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-08 11:00 ` He Zhe [this message]
2020-03-10 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-10 15:30 ` He Zhe
2020-03-10 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-11 4:03 ` He Zhe
2020-03-11 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 11:01 ` He Zhe
2020-03-16 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 8:50 ` He Zhe
2020-03-17 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-18 6:33 ` He Zhe
2020-03-11 10:29 ` Martin Wilck
2020-03-11 15:11 ` Martin Wilck
2020-03-16 11:02 ` He Zhe
2020-03-16 11:17 ` Martin Wilck
2020-03-17 8:51 ` He Zhe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=071c4f38-df7b-b094-1bd0-436fcdb05767@windriver.com \
--to=zhe.he@windriver.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).